Garnett said:
stephen700 said:
The 360 controller and Ps3 controller are practically identical antiquated pieces of junk which as far as FPS games are concerned are unusable when compared to using a Mouse - FPS on consoles are practically unplayable.
Aside from that the X360 controller has improved ergonomics but nothing significant they have exactly the same dual analogue - 4 button and d pad with dual triggers - the different color is no advantage and overall they both suck.
I would say the motion sensing on the DualShock3 or Sixaxis as an significant advantage but it's unspported by almost all games (only around 1/4 driving games support it , almost no suport in FPS !) so it does not really count - it has absolutley no operating system support at all.
- The Wii mote on the other hand blow them both out of the water - it gives IR sensing and motion , vibration and auditory feedback and provides a mouse like ability to point and select on screen in a highly intuituve way.
|
Erm....Controllers are best for Fast FPS games,Mouses are best for Realistic FPS games,since mouse have far more percesion and require you to pick them up and move them back over.
|
Thumbstick Controllers best for Fast FPS games - Wrong.
Mouse is way faster - the UT3 port to the PS3 they had to slow it down by 20% because otherwise the people using their sixaxis were betting hammered by the people using mouse and keyboard.
Mouse is faster, easier , more accurate more intuitive and far more enjoyable to use for FPS than any thumbstick controller ever made. Thumbsticks were designed for 2D platform games and I was hoping should have been dropped from this generation of games consoles completly -
GT are correct the PS3-sixaxis is outdated -the Wii mote is the new way to play.
