By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - GT5 car list. No longer it is taking so long.

outlawauron on 31 July 2007

it cut off my post..........



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
chuckd on 31 July 2007

And you thought they were having a tough time putting PGR on one dvd. If they put all those cars out, they couldn't fit them on a br disk.

Look for me on the GT:HD leaderboards!

chuck



jjseth on 31 July 2007

I really don't see how they cannot add damage to the vehicles or that the manufacturer's won't allow it. Heck. Forza 2 has damage on the cars no matter the car.

Maybe they could satiate the companies by having the default not show damage on the car? And then allow the users to turn on the damage models.



 


Get your Portable ID!

 

My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard. And they're like, "You wanna trade cards?" Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I'll trade this, but not my charizard.

your mother on 31 July 2007
jjseth said:
I really don't see how they cannot add damage to the vehicles or that the manufacturer's won't allow it. Heck. Forza 2 has damage on the cars no matter the car.

Maybe they could satiate the companies by having the default not show damage on the car? And then allow the users to turn on the damage models.

It's actually a steaming pile of bullshit lies.

Most of the cars from GT:HD are also found in Forza 2. That never stopped Forza 2 developers to include damage modeling in their game.

I attribute Polyphony's comment about "car manufacturers don't want their cars wrecked" to be nothing more than a mouthful of verbal diarrhoea.

Polyphony is simply too lazy to exert the effort to implement damage modeling, pure and simple.



WiteoutKing on 01 August 2007

Ooooookay then. I was considering getting this game because I haven't given the racing genre a fair shake in recent years.

Looking at that list has changed my mind. There's no way in hell I want to play a game with that many damn cars. 380 at start? Good lord. What happened to games with a dozen or two?

I have a REALLY hard time believing the 10k figure. That just seems like complete and utter overkill.

 

EDIT: I should explain.  What I'm getting at is that when I try a racing game, I'm rarely if ever interested in how real the cars act, as far as exact specs and precision performance and all that.  I just wanna choose whichever car happens to look cool, and drive it.  I'd be lying if I said I wasn't altogether intimidated and ultimately "scared off" by that massive number.



PS3: 5.51m/51w, avg 108,039/w (up 239)
360: 12.93m/102w, avg 126,764/w (up 625), leads PS3 by 7.42m (up 70k), avg lead 18,725/w (up 386)
Wii: 13.52m/51w, avg 265,098/w (dn 1,102), leads PS3 by 8.01m (up 90k), avg lead 157,059/w (dn 1,341)

If 360 sales stabilize, PS3 sales increases needed to pass 360 by...
01/08: (008w) +875.8%, 04/08: (021w) +344.4%, 07/08: (034w) +219.3%, 10/08: (047w) +163.5%
01/09: (060w) +131.8%, 04/09: (073w) +111.4%, 07/09: (085w) +098.1%, 10/09: (099w) +086.7%
If Wii sales stabilize, PS3 sales increases needed to pass Wii by...
01/08: (008w) +1072.%, 04/08: (021w) +498.4%, 07/08: (034w) +363.4%, 10/08: (047w) +303.1%
01/09: (060w) +269.0%, 04/09: (073w) +246.9%, 07/09: (085w) +232.6%, 10/09: (099w) +220.3%
If PS2 sales freeze, Wii sales increases needed to pass PS2 (as of Mar07, 108.4m) by...
2008: (008w) +4373.8%, 2009: (060w) +0496.5%, 2010: (112w) +0219.6%, 2011: (165w) +0116.9%
2012: (217w) +0064.9%, 2013: (269w) +0033.1%, 2014: (321w) +0011.5%, 2015: (376w) -0004.8%
At +0% it will pass it in 358w, the week ending September 19th, 2014, at an age of 409w (7y44w).
Current age of PS2: 7y37w.

Last update: Week ending November 3, 2007

Around the Network
BenKenobi88 on 01 August 2007

There better be a Jeep Wrangler...



LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release.  (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )

wangfoo on 01 August 2007

Impressive list - but wouldn't posting a link be a little easier?

Looking forward to playing the game.



"Suck on it" -vgchartz mod

ssj12 on 01 August 2007
your mother said:
jjseth said:
I really don't see how they cannot add damage to the vehicles or that the manufacturer's won't allow it. Heck. Forza 2 has damage on the cars no matter the car.

Maybe they could satiate the companies by having the default not show damage on the car? And then allow the users to turn on the damage models.

It's actually a steaming pile of bullshit lies.

Most of the cars from GT:HD are also found in Forza 2. That never stopped Forza 2 developers to include damage modeling in their game.

I attribute Polyphony's comment about "car manufacturers don't want their cars wrecked" to be nothing more than a mouthful of verbal diarrhoea.

Polyphony is simply too lazy to exert the effort to implement damage modeling, pure and simple.

no car manufactures used to hate their cars getting damaged, hence why Need for Speed used to never have name brand cars, same with Burnout. Look at Motorstorm it doesnt (does Dirt?).

 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
AllAll on 01 August 2007

Forzas damage sucks shiet, way to fake.



your mother on 01 August 2007
ssj12 said:
your mother said:
jjseth said:
I really don't see how they cannot add damage to the vehicles or that the manufacturer's won't allow it. Heck. Forza 2 has damage on the cars no matter the car.

Maybe they could satiate the companies by having the default not show damage on the car? And then allow the users to turn on the damage models.

It's actually a steaming pile of bullshit lies.

Most of the cars from GT:HD are also found in Forza 2. That never stopped Forza 2 developers to include damage modeling in their game.

I attribute Polyphony's comment about "car manufacturers don't want their cars wrecked" to be nothing more than a mouthful of verbal diarrhoea.

Polyphony is simply too lazy to exert the effort to implement damage modeling, pure and simple.

no car manufactures used to hate their cars getting damaged, hence why Need for Speed used to never have name brand cars, same with Burnout. Look at Motorstorm it doesnt (does Dirt?).

 

I don't quite follow your comment, but I gather you're trying to say that:

Car manufacturers hate to see their cars damaged in-game, and that's why NFS never used to have name brand cars; this can also be seen in games like Burnout and Motorstorm.

Is that the gist of what you're saying?