| BringBackChrono said: Do all the Automobile companies have these same issues? i.e , they all dont give permission for showing damage? |
probably, they like to think the cars they make are industractable. or they all play gt and suck ass at it so they realize if damage was added they would never win
I entered the thread wondering what type of technical problems GT5 was facing. Now I am leaving the thread wondering why I entered in the first place.
Thanks for the input, Jeff.
| KylieDog said: It'll be GT1 again. Every single GT game has been GT1. They don't change. |
Yeah, they don't change.... except for the tuning options, tracks, cars, physics, reward systems, and online modes. How many of these GT games have you actually sat down with? Coming off that ignorant post, I'd say zero.
markers said:
probably, they like to think the cars they make are industractable. or they all play gt and suck ass at it so they realize if damage was added they would never win |
heh, that could be it. But still, damage would be the big thing for GT5, if implemented. Maybe Polyphony should go the konami way. If you dont get the license, use the same car, and change the name(like the ridiculous alternate team names in PES). Like Ferrali, McRalen etc etc.
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murders will foam up about their waist and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"...
....and I'll look down and whisper "no."
- Rorschach
BringBackChrono said:
heh, that could be it. But still, damage would be the big thing for GT5, if implemented. Maybe Polyphony should go the konami way. If you dont get the license, use the same car, and change the name(like the ridiculous alternate team names in PES). Like Ferrali, McRalen etc etc.
|
I refuse to drive in a Ninjitsubishi, DMW or bercedes menz...
Wait, the car companies actually have to damage their own car, or show one that is damaged, to these developers?
Can't the developers just use their imagination? Does the damage really have to be perfectly realistic for each individual car? Damn that's really paying attention to detail.. :P
| markers said: to convince ferrai all you gotta do is buy a ferrai rig it to some remote controls and crash the bitch right in front of their CEO and show tell them "if it can happen in real life it damn sure is gonna happen in our game, so sign the fudging papers" easy as that |
BRILLIANCE!!!! SONY SHOULD PAY YOU!!!
4 ≈ One
Dgc1808 said:
BRILLIANCE!!!! SONY SHOULD PAY YOU!!! |
i work for free 
| wfz said: Wait, the car companies actually have to damage their own car, or show one that is damaged, to these developers? Can't the developers just use their imagination? Does the damage really have to be perfectly realistic for each individual car? Damn that's really paying attention to detail.. :P |
I don't think thats the case.. Car companies like their cars in games because it's good advertising, but damaged cars aren't seen as such good advertisement.
lol at yet another fail thread.....................all they are saying is that its proving difficult to get ferrari to agree 2 damage on thier licenced cars. the visual damage on forza2 is very very poor indeed wen u compare it to things like burnout. i feel in turn10's game they had to limit visual damage on all cars to keep in line with ferrari's allowance for it. otherwise it wud cleary stand out that all other cars hav shit loads of pieces missing and feraris only a bumper hanging off...................imo thats y forza2 damage was crap, i feel gt5 damage will be similar because of ferrari restrictions if u know wat i mean..............just an opinion mind u
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
