I am quite surprised how honest the reviewers are considering how much hype the game had on GT.

Anyway I love that you also can play as Russian considering I loved the Russian parts of COD 2. Oh well I am not sure if I am going to get it, I already killed more Germans in games than their are in real life so I am a bit tired of it.

Put either in your copy of Call of Duty 1, 2 and 3 in your system.

TA DA. World at War, except without a overpowered flame thrower. I save you 50 to 100 dollars (australian prices) Now go buy the better game Call of Duty 4.

Scrap 3 imo.

I'm playing it right now, I mean the game does feel like CoD4 but it feels like an improved CoD4 imo I mean dogs feel way more balanced then helicopters, artillery is much better then air strikes, and you still have the awesome radar.

I like the new perks and actually the story is much better then other WWII shooters it's not boring once so ever like the other WWII shooters I've played over the years.

It's flat out fun and more balanced then CoD4 you should really think about getting it.

Oh my, 360 version at 90 on metacritic. Who would have thought. I might get this after all. :D

Can anyone give a score for those of us too lazy to watch the whole review?

Watched my roommate play it for three hours and he finished it.


Get the flame thrower and nothing can stand up against you. Seriously. All the cool stuff you loved in Call of Duty 4 ARENT there. All reduced to long corridor shootings and trench ducking.

BORING. Thats my score.

it doesnt look as good as CoD4 IMO. i wouldnt play it if it wasnt for my brother buying it...

8.7 according to Metacritic

Thank you, I agree completely. The game is teeming with flaws, bugs and shoddy programming and there is nothing remotely intense or rewarding about the gameplay, the first one was heaps more intense than this (and miles better btw).