I really hate that habit of yours Zen where you try to demonize a very large group of people. All the PS3 fans on the forum are going to come here and badmouth the game eh? Not fanboys even, fans. So you are directly calling out people like myself and Blade and others and telling us we're going to troll. Just stick to arguing facts, and stop trying to make a PS3 fanboy witch hunt out of every single thread.

Bah, OXM have Lost Odyssey a 7.5, and I loved that game.
Even an average rpg with HD graphics is worth a play through. We aren't getting 5 or 6 rpgs a month like the PS2 used to, so we got to play what we get.

same old typical Zen pretending PS3 fanboys are the 2nd coming of the devil....

Well we're used to it & frankly BORED.

TLR has looked average since a very long time.

The Battle system looks boring, the graphics don't look nice.

I won't buy this when it come sto PS3.....n this review doesn't please me as I know this will come to PS3 at some point & I know its another JRPG which won't be great////

 QTF!


Anyway after Infinite undiscovery I didn't expected that the Last Renmant would be a great title though.

 Then please get Persona 4!

I hate it when people just say they won't even bother to at least try the game. :/

I never thought I would have played Blue Dragon, but that's a fine example of a hidden gem. I could make a list of other games that totally impressed me even though review scores were not so good. One on top of my head is Custom Robo: Battle Revolution on the GameCube.

Yes, you couldn't say it without mentioning me. Flaming me, and disguising your troll is a way to passive-agressively slip your opinion in without becoming tedious.

Now, I was pressed by a Sony fan, to tell you all why I said what I said. The truth.

Because the truth owns liars. It's as simple as that. Especially when you tell the truth before they get a chance to lie by omission about it.

The truth is no Sony fan gives OXM any credibility until they give a 360 exclusive a bad score. Then they act as if the game must certainly suck. You can't have it both ways, because I won't allow it.

Shocking I know what I'm talking about sometimes, huh?

Also, don't paraphrase my posts in internet language. I hate that shit.

Sorry zen, but you're about as good with "the truth" as Bush is with forming a coherent sentence.

I don't think you know what you're talking about. Official Xbox Magazine's scores aren't influenced or biased towards Microsoft. This is especially apparent when you view their past scores.

Favoring Microsoft

As an officially branded Xbox product, some have alleged the magazine is biased to first-party titles.^{[citation needed]} However, Official Xbox Magazine is created under license by an independent, external company (Future US, publisher of gaming magazines including PC Gamer, PSM, and Nintendo Power); that licensing agreement lasts until 2011.^[4] In the Magazine Stuff section of its Frequently Asked Questions list, OXM maintains that its content is not dictated by Microsoft.^[5]

Despite the allegations of favorable bias,^{[citation needed]} recent high-profile first-party games Shadowrun and Crackdown received review scores of 7.0, which were on-par or lower-than-average ratings.^[6] Currently, there is no statistical evidence to suggest that OXM's review scores are unusually favorable to Microsoft games.

Now, you know that I believe reviews don't matter. That said, I'm not ready to condemn a game after one review. Even if it might flop, that doesn't mean that I cease to be an intelligent individual.

A single source that you don't trust, that you haven't even seen any text of the review about, gives a numerical score for a game, only, and you're ready to condemn the game as terrible.

That, good sir, is a perfect example of the rampant ignorance and childish mindset that the internet is built around.

This thread is a perfect example of why review numbers are meaningless.

What the hell?

Explain.