The premise that cheap games=cheap development= subpar games is wrong. Rockstar's Table Tennis was a budget title. It has an 83% on Game Rankings and is a most fun multiplayer title.

Fixed.

Winning by just over 1 million units (about 20k per week) is far closer to squeaking by than it is to domination.

@PDF
damn straight someone will mention the Wii. it has completely blown Sony away!

talk about being ingorant...seems someone is taking the "Lose Respect on Forums 101" here...

i've got the demo and I looks anything but cheap, just because its going have a great price don't mean its sub par...

I feel the same too

@viper

The ps3 costs 3x as much as an x360 in europe

and 2x as much in usa

so winning globally even by a million is a great thing

Ofcourse nothing will save x360 in 2009 when PS3 will have even a better exclusive library and room for price cuts

if the ps3 drops to 300$ or euro it will be game over for x360 worldwide

Price is irrelevant to the verb used. Dominate. The action itself is not dependent on the values of outside factors such as price.

Dominating would suggest, regardless of price, that a product had a far superior rating on a given metric over another product. The fact that the metric given, sales, shows that they were not so far different means that one product did not dominate the other.


Many of you Sony fans disregard actual verbal context and introduce hyperbole as factual notions and use irrelevant circumstances as validation.

That's damage control, and it totally ignores the fact that the trends have shifted back towards the 360 ww lately.

The PS3 not now, nor ever has "dominated" anything except the BR market. Edged out a victory at some things, maybe.

You want the definition of domination, look at the Wii. The Wii dominates the PS3 and 360. Lets hear you damage control on that one.

sony always dominate
this gen is just starting off slow
now we see the games on the ps3 are growing