http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/85433.html

Gameplay footage^^^

Awesome.....!

A harpoon would kick ass, it be fun "throwing" a wii mote as a harpoon and hitting jaws in the ass.

Didn't take long for someone like you to come in here and say something like that.

 TV sets wouldn'e be happy about that feature

You got it DonWii!

 just strap it down tight.

To be honest, it doesn't look that great, technically...it does look pretty good though.  It's not bad for the Wii anyway.

I don't know if this is my kind of game though...I'm getting sucked into these casual or relaxing games lately though...I'll probably end up renting this one to see what it's all about.

No worries DonWii, I found it through your first link anyways :D

I dont know if I would go as far as to say 3x GC. Becuase, really nothing to me looked better than RE4. Now, it is one of the best looking games on the Wii. But the light reflections look very good, the question here is do they look good when your playing. Becuase I have seen stuff like that that looks so beautiful when shown in videos, but when you 'interact' it just looks wonky. Now I'm not saying that is the case, because I doubt it is. It looks very good, especially for the Wii. It looks really intresting, but if it costs over 20$ it's WAAAY too expensive for what I pay for games like that. I perfer my relaxation games to be free, or cheap. (under 10$)

This game does look really nice for the Wii. But one thing I would like to point out, I see 2 render methods going on there, and almost all of it is one of them, and that makes me wonder. A good example of a game using 2 render methods is look at Heavenly Sword. The game itself looks really good for what it is, but the 'closeup' 'real time cutscene' looks AMAZING. I noticed that 'effect' on that video. It seems like almost everything on that video is the 'real time cutscene' becuase most of the scenes with the 'scuba guy' didnt look as good as the ones without him. Then some of them looked amazing compared to others. That graphical in-consistancy, makes me think there are at least, 2 render methods for the game. Which makes me think that the 'actual' game dont look as good as you might think.

I'd say it looks 50% GC. 

I don't know about the graphics either.... I kind of just went by what Joystiq said. Reason why I posted the link anyway; some humor.

Thanks for the help Ben.