Then I can create a site, make a poor review, and kill a game if i want ?
Time to Work !
libellule - Yes. That's why I always go with Gamerankings.com
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
@masterbr8tr
no it isn't....do the maths again
________________
@libellule
not really....as blogs or things like that don't count
"prepare for sony fans attack now"
LOL who is going to attack a 90 averaged game? Maybe a 60 or 70
| CaptDS9E said: You know what, at this point who cares about the scores. So many sites have given it 90+ I could care less about its final metacritic score. It's a good game which I'm sure we will all enjoy |
agree imo fable 1 was way underrated even if it didnt deliver everything it promised. But it will be fun to see if the game manages to keep it score above 90 which it probably deserves(fable 1 did imo)
dagbladet: 5/6
http://www.dagbladet.no/spill/
| darthdevidem01 said: @masterbr8tr no it isn't....do the maths again ________________ @libellule not really....as blogs or things like that don't count |
you didnt count the vg score.
Well I see my money was well spent. I hope I enjoy it as I never played the first Fable!
Love the product, not the company. They love your money, not you.
-TheRealMafoo
| NNN2004 said: prepare for sony fans attack now. |
why? the game has very good scores.
Incorrect.
Metacritic doesn't do any review. LBP has about fifty or so reviews in the LBP review thread, but Metacritic only had 19, and gamerankings has 14.
If that was the case, then why aren't VGC reviews on Metacritic?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
