By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Who broke the thread?



Around the Network
darthdevidem01 said:
next week PS3 up again....+ PES is out soon + LBP + RES 2 (REs 1 sold MORE than GEOW 1 in EU BTW)

 

 really i didnt know that!



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

selnor said:
Imperial said:
selnor said:
NNN2004 said:
Bokal said:
NNN2004 said:

others really brainwashed by sony ... PS3 sell even without AAA games !? weird.

I could also say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without AAA games !? weird." But it's only a matter of opinions.

But I could say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without a bluray drive, wifi and a hard drive and you need to pay to play online !? weird."
These one are facts...
Ok... only the good part of the facts, but still facts.

 

 YAH Weird

The thing is the only thing we have to go off to decide which has more AAA games is metacritic and that backs NNN2004 100%. So in effect Bokal yours is opinion and NNN2004 has backing of the majority of opinions which would then equal fact.

 

Sorry.

 

 

Your logical abilities are really weak.

Actually your logic is flawed. How else do you guage AAA titles? Metacritics which is an average of opinions is the only fair way to do it. Otherwise there is no pint EVER discussing AAA titles.

 

well its metacritic logic thats flawed.

1 game can get 91 based of 40 reviews, then another game can get 87 based of 60 reviews.

ghost recon 2 is a much much better game than ghost recon 1, but according to metacritic ghost recon 1 is the AAA game?

the best reviews come from the gamers, and at the end of this year ps3 would have had the better games in 2008

 



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

So much anger in this thread today. Trolling, accusations, reprimands from the lovely staff, name-calling. Some people must've eaten some bad poi.



Can't we all just get along and play our games in peace?

I think M$ shud start giving the 360 out for free now. That will guarantee a win in Others. This is really a sound plan, especially coz they have the $$$ for that



 

It is better to die on one's feet

then live on one's knees

Around the Network
Skeeuk said:
selnor said:
Imperial said:
selnor said:
NNN2004 said:
Bokal said:
NNN2004 said:

others really brainwashed by sony ... PS3 sell even without AAA games !? weird.

I could also say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without AAA games !? weird." But it's only a matter of opinions.

But I could say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without a bluray drive, wifi and a hard drive and you need to pay to play online !? weird."
These one are facts...
Ok... only the good part of the facts, but still facts.

 

 YAH Weird

The thing is the only thing we have to go off to decide which has more AAA games is metacritic and that backs NNN2004 100%. So in effect Bokal yours is opinion and NNN2004 has backing of the majority of opinions which would then equal fact.

 

Sorry.

 

 

Your logical abilities are really weak.

Actually your logic is flawed. How else do you guage AAA titles? Metacritics which is an average of opinions is the only fair way to do it. Otherwise there is no pint EVER discussing AAA titles.

 

well its metacritic logic thats flawed.

1 game can get 91 based of 40 reviews, then another game can get 87 based of 60 reviews.

ghost recon 2 is a much much better game than ghost recon 1, but according to metacritic ghost recon 1 is the AAA game?

the best reviews come from the gamers, and at the end of this year ps3 would have had the better games in 2008

 

 

 

Well then it's simple really.

 

1. we use metacritics in our posts which acknowledges it as a fair way to guage a systems titles or

 

2. we never mention it here again on VGchartz.

We either use it or dont. I will point out that almost everyone here uses it when it suits them. But when anyone mentions how many the 360 has over PS3, people start saying all this rubbish. You either USE it, or NEVER use it.

Imperial

Bokal

Sheeuk.

I hope to never see you mention metacritic again in favour of a PS3 game.



after all 3rd party comapnies chose the best console to put their games on & we know all which console is it.



another price cut?

at this rate the 360 will sell for 99$ before the ps2-



PS3 is really picking up steam in Europe now. I was in a couple stores today and SIX PS3's were sold in the short time i was there. No 360, no Wii's.

Guess it's because of all the mainstream praise for LBP.

So the 360 price drop and all the marketing has definitely not worked much for MS.

I can guarantee that in the next couple weeks PS3 will sell amazingly and much better than 360.



selnor said:
Skeeuk said:
selnor said:
Imperial said:
selnor said:
NNN2004 said:
Bokal said:
NNN2004 said:

others really brainwashed by sony ... PS3 sell even without AAA games !? weird.

I could also say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without AAA games !? weird." But it's only a matter of opinions.

But I could say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without a bluray drive, wifi and a hard drive and you need to pay to play online !? weird."
These one are facts...
Ok... only the good part of the facts, but still facts.

 

 YAH Weird

The thing is the only thing we have to go off to decide which has more AAA games is metacritic and that backs NNN2004 100%. So in effect Bokal yours is opinion and NNN2004 has backing of the majority of opinions which would then equal fact.

 

Sorry.

 

 

Your logical abilities are really weak.

Actually your logic is flawed. How else do you guage AAA titles? Metacritics which is an average of opinions is the only fair way to do it. Otherwise there is no pint EVER discussing AAA titles.

 

well its metacritic logic thats flawed.

1 game can get 91 based of 40 reviews, then another game can get 87 based of 60 reviews.

ghost recon 2 is a much much better game than ghost recon 1, but according to metacritic ghost recon 1 is the AAA game?

the best reviews come from the gamers, and at the end of this year ps3 would have had the better games in 2008

 

 

 

Well then it's simple really.

 

1. we use metacritics in our posts which acknowledges it as a fair way to guage a systems titles or

 

2. we never mention it here again on VGchartz.

We either use it or dont. I will point out that almost everyone here uses it when it suits them. But when anyone mentions how many the 360 has over PS3, people start saying all this rubbish. You either USE it, or NEVER use it.

Imperial

Bokal

Sheeuk.

I hope to never see you mention metacritic again in favour of a PS3 game.

 

 Read my sig. Metacritic is flawed.

I think using it comparably is flawed. I think we should use it situationally.

Basically comparing games to each other is stupid when you consider the same people and same amount didn't review each game. But when talking about a specific game then it would be fine.