Skeeuk said:
selnor said:
Imperial said:
selnor said:
NNN2004 said:
Bokal said:
NNN2004 said:
others really brainwashed by sony ... PS3 sell even without AAA games !? weird.
|
I could also say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without AAA games !? weird." But it's only a matter of opinions.
But I could say "NA really brainwashed by MS... 360 sell even without a bluray drive, wifi and a hard drive and you need to pay to play online !? weird."
These one are facts...
Ok... only the good part of the facts, but still facts.
|
YAH Weird 
|
The thing is the only thing we have to go off to decide which has more AAA games is metacritic and that backs NNN2004 100%. So in effect Bokal yours is opinion and NNN2004 has backing of the majority of opinions which would then equal fact.
Sorry.
|
Your logical abilities are really weak.
|
Actually your logic is flawed. How else do you guage AAA titles? Metacritics which is an average of opinions is the only fair way to do it. Otherwise there is no pint EVER discussing AAA titles.
|
well its metacritic logic thats flawed.
1 game can get 91 based of 40 reviews, then another game can get 87 based of 60 reviews.
ghost recon 2 is a much much better game than ghost recon 1, but according to metacritic ghost recon 1 is the AAA game?
the best reviews come from the gamers, and at the end of this year ps3 would have had the better games in 2008
|
Well then it's simple really.
1. we use metacritics in our posts which acknowledges it as a fair way to guage a systems titles or
2. we never mention it here again on VGchartz.
We either use it or dont. I will point out that almost everyone here uses it when it suits them. But when anyone mentions how many the 360 has over PS3, people start saying all this rubbish. You either USE it, or NEVER use it.
Imperial
Bokal
Sheeuk.
I hope to never see you mention metacritic again in favour of a PS3 game.
