This thread wont hold very long.

I think we should also revive the "when PS3 will beat 360 thread" b/c everyone expected them to beat  by 2009 and it doesn't look like that will happen.

 ==> you know even if the Xbox360 get +20k next week, it will not look more amazing to me.

...

Let's wait.

I said it will beat the Xbox360 at Xmas09.

Since the xbox360 get a price drop, I would move my precition to early 2010.

This is in less than 1.5 years ...

@Libellule

you are completely PWNING 360 fanboys....keept it up!

Looks like all consoles are down and the United States is gripped in uncertainty by a financial crisis to me.

usually i would respond to this but you just pwnd yourself.

twice.

... in one post.

or your incapable of puting forward an argument towards that point.

In fact it is due that point that PS3 has great percieved value.

Fine. First of all he said that the xbox 360 is more expencive due to all it's accessories which is what "we" have been saying all the time. Therefore he just agreed that microsoft offer less value for your money.. and hence he just pwnd himself.

Second of all he assumes that everyone getting said console would get all of these ekstra things and that they would automatically go for the most expencive model which is just plain ignorant. Therefore he pwnd himself again. (for instance with the $100 for live. It's funny how everyone's kept claiming xbox 360 was cheaper and that's why you should get it and then when it's ahead for two weeks it's suddenly more expencive then the ps3? Infact his whole post says that it's more expencive but microsoft was smart because it's cheaper. It's like dividing with zero.

There.

I didn't say it was incorrect. I simply said he pwnd himself twice which was why a response would be unnessesary.

i think MS has positioned itself to be the greatest beneficiary when 3rd party games like Rockband/GH come out because its the cheapest option for those looking to buy those games.