A forummer(mke67) that never post any reply before told me that he/she has played the R2 Beta and the gameplay is sucks,do you think i'm going to trust his/her word?Sorry,never going to trust what fanboy said.
A forummer(mke67) that never post any reply before told me that he/she has played the R2 Beta and the gameplay is sucks,do you think i'm going to trust his/her word?Sorry,never going to trust what fanboy said.
mke67 said: OK people I've played the R2 beta and one thing I can say is the gameplay sucks. So what if a game looks good, if gameplay sucks then the prettiest graphics are a waste. |
your opinion and yours alone. I love it.
*Everyone I'm number three on the leaderboards!!! I are sooo goooood! - PSN: Trihang
"YouR opinion is WronG!!!"
mke67 said: OK people I've played the R2 beta and one thing I can say is the gameplay sucks. So what if a game looks good, if gameplay sucks then the prettiest graphics are a waste. |
your opinion and yours alone. I love it.
*Everyone I'm number three on the leaderboards!!! I are sooo goooood! - PSN: Trihang
sorry for the double post.
"YouR opinion is WronG!!!"
twesterm said:
pssst...I lost interest in this thread long ago and only clicked it by accident but you do know volumetric fog is just, as you call it, 2D sprites. It's something that has been around for quite a while, UT2k4 even, and isn't something all that special. |
If you are going to condescendingly correct someone you should at least.... be correct. I don't know if and where either game uses volumetric particle systems. But saying "volumetric fog is just 2D sprites" --the last word becoming a bit flexible in its meaning these days-- is probably one of the silliest posts I've read here (although my brain does seem to automatically filter out some people for its own protection).
The key word here is volumetric. It has the word volume in it. This should have been a red flag.
A planar or 2D object does not have a volume, it has an area. This is why you don't buy milk by the square foot or land by the gallon.
Incidentally, volumetric particle systems are hard to do well even on the new GPGPUs and it's the one few obvious strengths of the CBE in games. So there is a ounce of plausibility to this.
^^^you should be banned,,,why the hell do you revive a 3 months old thread?
This game doesn't suck, but Gears 2 definitely has better graphics. Significantly better graphics.
It's fun to see what people (including me o.O) were saying just a few months ago...
Kantor, Resistance 2 looked much better in screenshots than Gears. I thought Gears had slight edge from the screens but after playing both games it's not close. Gears 2 looks far better than Resistance 2.
@sonyboys: Keep dreaming but do it for yourself and stop making threads about it.