Can't wait.
I think it's safe to say that crow will be eaten. The question is, who will be eating it?
Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.
Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.
Look really, Ted Price is a very respectable guy and not once has he ever compared his game to Cliff's. Resistance will be a great game in its own respect but I really don't think there's a chance it will stand up to Gears graphically. I don't know what gave everyone that impression. The bottom line is that no one will be eating crow except for the fanboys. Ted hasn't said anything.
"YouR opinion is WronG!!!"
i dont want any 5 on 5 matches on my connection.
we will have to wait to see per-attach how the sales go.
both will be good games but resistance 2 looks the better.
overall due to a temporary sales lead, gears 2 should sell more copies, but the features in resistance 2 are far better, and is a true sequel.
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
i dont want to be playing 5 vs 5
i want to be playing in a match with 60 people :)
| Skeeuk said:
i dont want any 5 on 5 matches on my connection. we will have to wait to see per-attach how the sales go. both will be good games but resistance 2 looks the better. overall due to a temporary sales lead, gears 2 should sell more copies, but the features in resistance 2 are far better, and is a true sequel. |
And Gears 2 isn't because..?
Rainbird said:
And Gears 2 isn't because..? |
The original GoW is very good by itself, and there isn't much to improve... you can give more of what you gave in the original+extras.
R2, on the other hand, improves every aspect that was lax in the original - the main character, graphics, online play, single player campaign...
That's how I see it.
Rainbird said:
And Gears 2 isn't because..? |
You know......... Because Gears 1 was.........
Huh, I'm scratching my head here too.
Xen said:
The original GoW is very good by itself, and there isn't much to improve... you can give more of what you gave in the original+extras. R2, on the other hand, improves every aspect that was lax in the original - the main character, graphics, online play, single player campaign... That's how I see it.
|
Not like Gears 2 isn't improving anything from the first game. For example, having more real physics is a plus compared to the first one when objects and people just exploded into chunks (not counting physics in cut-scenes).
On topic- Check out Gametrailers