By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - It doesn't seem like much, but Dead Rising Wii is improving.

twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said:
The game will be released in a few months and it looks horrible. You have to think that it's September now, and for the game to get a "late 2008" release, it has to be close to done. QA testing and certification of the game will need to be done, and then manufacturing and shipping the game. Considering the game would have to go gold sometime in the next sixty to ninety days (latest) to meet the deadline, IDK how people can think that this game will look much better.

 

This is supposed to be a 2008 game?  I thought this was going to be a 2009 game.

If that's the case then they aren't going to get many if any more zombies on screen at a time.  In order to get a siginificant more amount of zombies on screen they are going to have to do one of the following:

  • Rewrite everything - not going to happen since that would take a very large amount of time.
  • Start cutting things other places - The world already feels bare enough so I doubt there's really much they could cut

A 2008 release date confirms that this game is going to suck.  This means they are already in very late alpha and possibly even beta.  That means there's no new art or major game changes so that means no cutting back on the world to add more zombies.  The only thing they're doing now is just fixing bugs. 

If they're Alpha they're fixing showstopping bugs, if they're in Beta they've moved on to focusing on the B and C bugs.  Either way, those screen shots are what we're going to get.

Read my post right above yours.

 



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
Around the Network

theyd better amke up for this by making monster hunter dam awesome



 nintendo fanboy, but the good kind

proud soldier of nintopia

 

This looks bad.. I hope this doesn't get hyped at all, flops, and then the person in charge gets a cold.



i was happy when they announced this game but the screenshots and the videos just look horrible, there are loads of ps2 games that look better then this, capcom probably gave it a very low budget, the success of re4 really had negative effect on capcom, they are convinced only ports sale on wii.



Wii/Mario Kart Wii Code:2793-0686-5434

If they really can't get it to work on time, a delay isn't impossible.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight said:
If they really can't get it to work on time, a delay isn't impossible.

I admire your determination.

On-topic, the alpha build looks like shit, or whatever else they're calling that mess of a game nowadays. Even worse than that, it seems the developers have lost focus on why Dead Rising was fun in the first place. Hint to Capcom: It doesn't involve improved gun controls and a vast emptiness of mall space.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



We don't know that's the alpha build. That's part of my point. There are too many assumptions, and not enough wait-the-fuck-and-see.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

thekitchensink said:
twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said:
The game will be released in a few months and it looks horrible. You have to think that it's September now, and for the game to get a "late 2008" release, it has to be close to done. QA testing and certification of the game will need to be done, and then manufacturing and shipping the game. Considering the game would have to go gold sometime in the next sixty to ninety days (latest) to meet the deadline, IDK how people can think that this game will look much better.

 

This is supposed to be a 2008 game?  I thought this was going to be a 2009 game.

If that's the case then they aren't going to get many if any more zombies on screen at a time.  In order to get a siginificant more amount of zombies on screen they are going to have to do one of the following:

  • Rewrite everything - not going to happen since that would take a very large amount of time.
  • Start cutting things other places - The world already feels bare enough so I doubt there's really much they could cut

A 2008 release date confirms that this game is going to suck.  This means they are already in very late alpha and possibly even beta.  That means there's no new art or major game changes so that means no cutting back on the world to add more zombies.  The only thing they're doing now is just fixing bugs. 

If they're Alpha they're fixing showstopping bugs, if they're in Beta they've moved on to focusing on the B and C bugs.  Either way, those screen shots are what we're going to get.

Read my post right above yours.

 

They aren't going to make that big of an improvement in a month.  It just doesn't happen.

 



twesterm said:
thekitchensink said:
twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said:
The game will be released in a few months and it looks horrible. You have to think that it's September now, and for the game to get a "late 2008" release, it has to be close to done. QA testing and certification of the game will need to be done, and then manufacturing and shipping the game. Considering the game would have to go gold sometime in the next sixty to ninety days (latest) to meet the deadline, IDK how people can think that this game will look much better.

 

This is supposed to be a 2008 game?  I thought this was going to be a 2009 game.

If that's the case then they aren't going to get many if any more zombies on screen at a time.  In order to get a siginificant more amount of zombies on screen they are going to have to do one of the following:

  • Rewrite everything - not going to happen since that would take a very large amount of time.
  • Start cutting things other places - The world already feels bare enough so I doubt there's really much they could cut

A 2008 release date confirms that this game is going to suck.  This means they are already in very late alpha and possibly even beta.  That means there's no new art or major game changes so that means no cutting back on the world to add more zombies.  The only thing they're doing now is just fixing bugs. 

If they're Alpha they're fixing showstopping bugs, if they're in Beta they've moved on to focusing on the B and C bugs.  Either way, those screen shots are what we're going to get.

Read my post right above yours.

 

They aren't going to make that big of an improvement in a month.  It just doesn't happen.

 

 

A couple months. It's release coming out winter 2008, which means December at earliest. Of course that may not be much anyway, and this can be screwed up. I just refuse to assume the game's quality until it's finished.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
We don't know that's the alpha build. That's part of my point. There are too many assumptions, and not enough wait-the-fuck-and-see.

Good point. Too many assumptions. Not enough wait-the-fuck-and-see. Gotcha.

Hey Lord, I need help figuring out which forum member said this:

And the Sean White thing. What the fuck? So what if it controls well. Could they at least have used a more advanced engine? The HD version is using the Assassin's Creed engine. Don't they have one to fit the Wii, like say, Unreal 2.5?

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.