thekitchensink on 11 September 2008
twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said: The game will be released in a few months and it looks horrible. You have to think that it's September now, and for the game to get a "late 2008" release, it has to be close to done. QA testing and certification of the game will need to be done, and then manufacturing and shipping the game. Considering the game would have to go gold sometime in the next sixty to ninety days (latest) to meet the deadline, IDK how people can think that this game will look much better. |
This is supposed to be a 2008 game? I thought this was going to be a 2009 game.
If that's the case then they aren't going to get many if any more zombies on screen at a time. In order to get a siginificant more amount of zombies on screen they are going to have to do one of the following:
- Rewrite everything - not going to happen since that would take a very large amount of time.
- Start cutting things other places - The world already feels bare enough so I doubt there's really much they could cut
A 2008 release date confirms that this game is going to suck. This means they are already in very late alpha and possibly even beta. That means there's no new art or major game changes so that means no cutting back on the world to add more zombies. The only thing they're doing now is just fixing bugs.
If they're Alpha they're fixing showstopping bugs, if they're in Beta they've moved on to focusing on the B and C bugs. Either way, those screen shots are what we're going to get.
|
Read my post right above yours.
Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?
Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off. I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."