By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Wait, seriously? Sony's Mascot is Sackboy?

 

Pretty Baddass imo lol



Around the Network
Staude said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Soriku said:
They're AIMING for that, not decided, Companies can't use a character from an unproven franchise as a mascot. Doesn't work that way. Mass appeal is what decides.

 

 Sony has had too many games with far more interesting characters in its time. Nintendo did the right job with the NES by having the first game EVER be Mario/Duck hunt. Same for Sega with Sonic. Sony started out with Crash and dropped him when the franchise has sold more than 20 M.

Sony did not "drop" Crash.  They never owned him in the first place.

Sony dropped Crash. They are a subsidiary of Sony.

Nope.. naughty dog sold the franchise.

Crash used to be epic though.. now it's not even coming out for the ps3.. the franchise has died.

In either case. Sony has not 1 mascot but rather many.

Naughty Dog never owned the franchise.  Just as neither Insomniac nor Sony owned Spyro.  Universal Interactive owns both, and always has.



Hates Nomura.

Tagged: GooseGaws - <--- Has better taste in games than you.

Solid Snake and Kratos are not really mascot material, it has to be more family friendly.



GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Soriku said:
They're AIMING for that, not decided, Companies can't use a character from an unproven franchise as a mascot. Doesn't work that way. Mass appeal is what decides.

 Sony has had too many games with far more interesting characters in its time. Nintendo did the right job with the NES by having the first game EVER be Mario/Duck hunt. Same for Sega with Sonic. Sony started out with Crash and dropped him when the franchise has sold more than 20 M.

Sony did not "drop" Crash.  They never owned him in the first place.

Sony dropped Crash. They are a subsidiary of Sony.

Um... Vivendi Universal is a subsidiary of Sony?  News to me...

 

No, Nauty Dog is and they used to make the game before they sold it off.

 

And What the hell is up with your sig? Blasphemous....

 



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

GooseGaws said:
Staude said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Soriku said:
They're AIMING for that, not decided, Companies can't use a character from an unproven franchise as a mascot. Doesn't work that way. Mass appeal is what decides.

 

 Sony has had too many games with far more interesting characters in its time. Nintendo did the right job with the NES by having the first game EVER be Mario/Duck hunt. Same for Sega with Sonic. Sony started out with Crash and dropped him when the franchise has sold more than 20 M.

Sony did not "drop" Crash.  They never owned him in the first place.

Sony dropped Crash. They are a subsidiary of Sony.

Nope.. naughty dog sold the franchise.

Crash used to be epic though.. now it's not even coming out for the ps3.. the franchise has died.

In either case. Sony has not 1 mascot but rather many.

Naughty Dog never owned the franchise.  Just as neither Insomniac nor Sony owned Spyro.  Universal Interactive owns both, and always has.

well naughty dog developed crash originally.. i think they did atleast own parts of it. I read about it somewhere.. i might be completely off tho :p

 

In either case the franchise DIED ! horribly !

 



Check out my game about moles ^

Around the Network

Crash Bandicoot is a platform game published by Sony Computer Entertainment and developed by Naughty Dog for the PlayStation. It was released in North America on August 31, 1996,[1] in Europe on November 1996,[2] and in Japan on December 6, 1996.[2] The game, as well as being originally released on the PlayStation, was also emulated on the PlayStation Network on December 4, 2006, through which it can be played on the PlayStation Portable and, as of Operating System update 1.70, on the PlayStation 3.[3]

Wikipedia.....a powerful thing....



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

The crash franchise is the sixteenth-highest selling videogame franchise selling over 40 million units. LBP wont catch up to them. Especially with how horrible games are selling today. I am extremely disappointed in Sony and Naughty Dog. It's like they have A.D.D. Sony keeps giving the torch to someone new every gen. They dont have a true selling point.



forevercloud3000 said:
Crash Bandicoot is a platform game published by Sony Computer Entertainment and developed by Naughty Dog for the PlayStation. It was released in North America on August 31, 1996,[1] in Europe on November 1996,[2] and in Japan on December 6, 1996.[2] The game, as well as being originally released on the PlayStation, was also emulated on the PlayStation Network on December 4, 2006, through which it can be played on the PlayStation Portable and, as of Operating System update 1.70, on the PlayStation 3.[3]

Wikipedia.....a powerful thing....

This has absolutely nothing to do with who owns the rights to the franchise.  Do a little more research on your precious Wikipedia and you'll see that Naughty Dog signed a three-game deal with Universal Interactive with the intent of expanding the company, the results of which were the first three Crash titles.  As such, Universal Interactive owned and continues to own the rights to the IP.  Also, as already mentioned, Naughty Dog did not become a subsidiary of Sony until 2001.

 



Hates Nomura.

Tagged: GooseGaws - <--- Has better taste in games than you.

Sony is a kiddy console, confirmed, lol....j/k

Anyway, if LBP had been on a Nintendo console, then some of these fans you see, they would be marginalizing it as a kiddy game, that they hate to play, and they would instead be touting in Killzone 2. These are they hypocrisies of a fanboy.

If it was on 360, the one's currently marginalizing the game would probably put it towards the top of their list.

I've said it many times. I can't get this. I don't have a PS3 currently, and I don't like the look of the game enough to make me want to play it without even a rental. I do think it will sell well, and I also think it might top the gamerankings review scores, because critics would feel like hypocrites, were they to give it anything but perfect scores, after the ravings they've done over the previews.

This game, like Halo 3, and probably Fallout 3, Gears 2, and Resistance 2, are all destined to get AAA review scores, no matter how good or bad they are.

Games like RE5 are also pigeonholed as AA games only, due to their lack of innovation over the last iteration, and generalized impressions from demos, no matter how good, or bad they are. This, despite hyped games such as GTAIV, and Halo 3, which are also replicas of their previous entries, being hyped to hell and given perfect scores.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

forevercloud3000 said:

And What the hell is up with your sig? Blasphemous....

I call 'em like I see 'em, so to speak.



Hates Nomura.

Tagged: GooseGaws - <--- Has better taste in games than you.