GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
GooseGaws said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Soriku said:
They're AIMING for that, not decided, Companies can't use a character from an unproven franchise as a mascot. Doesn't work that way. Mass appeal is what decides. |
Sony has had too many games with far more interesting characters in its time. Nintendo did the right job with the NES by having the first game EVER be Mario/Duck hunt. Same for Sega with Sonic. Sony started out with Crash and dropped him when the franchise has sold more than 20 M.
|
Sony did not "drop" Crash. They never owned him in the first place.
|
Sony dropped Crash. They are a subsidiary of Sony.
|
Um... Vivendi Universal is a subsidiary of Sony? News to me...
|
No, Nauty Dog is and they used to make the game before they sold it off.
And What the hell is up with your sig? Blasphemous....
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/57911923/DQfpvkMU8AA_hnk.0.jpg)
