Sam Yikin said:
HappySqurriel said:
Wow, she must be a better candidate than I thought if you're stretching this far to discredit her ...
|
It doesn't look like much of a strech to be honest.
|
Think about it this way ... The first step in any vetting process I would create would be to get someone to tell me every skeleton they had in their closet, then to attach them to a lie-detector and ensure that they were not hiding anything from me. I wouldn't hold it against anyone for refusing to take part in this, but I would point out the obvious that anything they're hiding will come out in a presidential campaign. The second step would be to get a private investigator to look for anything unusual.
Within a couple of hours you would know anything that the candidate was worried about, and within a couple of days you would know about anything that people around them were worried about ...
After the most basic vetting process was done, most of the big shockers that you would expect to come out about a candidate would involve fairly ordinary mistakes people have made (affairs, trying drugs, etc.) and things they did not realize were that bad at the time (buisness dealings which were questionable).