blazinhead89 said:
You went a tad off topic there, besides by reading your post history I have come to the conclusion that your arguements ( a lot of them) are nothing but Fanboyish replies backed up with a bunch of BS crap with little to no relevance to do with the argument. Obviously you do this to try and trick people that you have a welk thought out unbias opinion. sorry Zen the Games up, You just lost |
I'd ask that you read my last post.
However, you made an assertion that I must answer.
You said I went "off topic" which I try not to do.
In this case, you are wrong, imo.
The reason is, the original post is an article. It's not a question piece with a specific area of discussion.
So, replies or comments can just as well be about the article or its credibility as they can be in reply to the article. I stated with obvious sarcasm that the topic creator must be bias. I did so without insulting anyone. I did a very good job, as you can see, there are nearly more replies to my small sarcasm commentary than to the original article. Not only that, but my sarcastic post raises many valid points when it comes to the credibility of the source of this article, which is perfectly accepted in other threads, regaurding authors that can't defend themselves. Impulsivity is ahead of the curve on that matter, as he can come to his own defense.
Also, you single my post out, yet there are a ton of other "off topic" comments that give opinions on the article, rather than discuss its assertions. Are you not holding people to a far stricter standard than would a normal person.
To be clear: As an imperfect poster, I stand by everything I've stated in this topic.
Articles have evolving discussions, and responses to others posts are completely accepted and not off topic, as are comments about the articles merits or the TC's credibility. When I create an anti-Sony topic, feel free to flame me. An example would be your post calling me out, which isn't off topic at all.
However, know this, my first post wasn't anti-Sony, or at least those were not my intentions, as I hope I made clear in my previous post. I'm not perfect. No one is. I just hope that most people here would agree that this article is an opinion piece from a biased poster.
@jaggedsac
You have, lol.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.














