forevercloud3000 said:
NiKKoM said: Why are you blaming Microsoft and Square??? Blame Sony for building a machine that doesn't sell that well, and may or may not be a little bit better than a machine which was released a year earlier and is darn hard to program for.. they themself lost the exclusive third party support... |
Wrong yet again Nikko( y must u post on everything I say? Never giving anything good)
Sony came into the gaming fray with everything going against them. They were not well known yet (as far as gaming goes) and wanted to try ambitious jumps in gaming tech. CDs? No one wanted to go with CDs as a gaming format, it was more costly than cartridge. Yet Sony proved that it was the better decision after a long grief period. PS2, same thing but this time with DVD. This was at the time when ppl were not sure about DVD as the successor to VHS. Sony took that chance, and they were right too. Now it is BluRay's turn, and it is proving itself to be more formidible every day. As Sony puts it "If we asked gamers if they wanted to advance forward, they would say no. They are Satisfied with the current. Yet we prove that if we just do it anyway, everyone is happy!"
And yes, it is harder to develop for, but is potentially better if u put in the time and effort. Best looking game in yrs(Uncharted), and tech heavy game(MGS4) can only be accomplished on PS3.
Sony NEVER has paid for exclusivity. Companies draw to them becuz of their good business ethics. This is y even tho many developers have defected, many still hold strong, and dont let MONEY from MS rob them of their integrity.
And this thread is not about which is better (but u can obiously tell which one I think is). That is completely besides the point. Mass Effect and Halo are good reasons to buy a 360. I would not want them to go multiplat either. Consoles deserve to have EXCLUSIVES to show off their hardware and what they do best.
good day SIR
|
This is the biggest load of bullshit you have spouted yet.
Sega and NEC pioneered CD in consoles NOT Sony.
If Sony never paid for an exclusive explain to me how Square mid nineties found the money to move to a brand new office building, explain to me what happened with Canadian independant developer Park Place Productions, what they did with british developer Psygnosis.
Sony gave a BIG payout to Square to switch alegiance(at a point where Square wanted to put FFVII on the Sega Saturn which was doing much better then the PS1 in Japan back then).
Sony wanted to buyout Park Place Productions, an independant Canadian developer making sports games for the likes of Acklaim and EA, the owners rather liked their independance yet one day when they came to work none of their employees were there. They had all been hired by Sony behind PPP`s back for their newly formed 989 PS sports label leaving PPP unable to finish their contractual obligations to EA(one less Madden game that year) and forcing them to declare bankruptcy.
Psygnosis was a third party with good relations with Sega and Nintendo and one of the best multiplatform developers, they also had next gen(for that time) deals in place with all three(Sega, Nintendo, Sony), Sony smoozed up to them and bought the company for way more then it was worth in straight cash so that they could stop the Psygnosis games from releasing on competing formats, both Sega and Nintendo however went to the courts to enforce the Psygnosis contracts so Sony outsourced the games to crappy developers to make the other versions look really shitty.
There are lots and lots of examples like this about the loose Sony ethics, suffice to say if MS tried anything close to the shit Sony has pulled in the past they woulod be rightfully crucified.
Yet we have ignorant little fanboys like you here who spout outright lies thinking them to be truth.