Dodece said: I have to ask are the future prospects for games on the Wii this shallow? Are there no other games to get excited about? Red Steel on its very best day might be called slightly below average. There are only two things that saved that game from falling off the radar and into the abyss. A decent soundtrack ashamed of itself for being in Red Steel, and the simplistic gameplay which all, but ensures that you will progress through the poorly designed levels.
I bought Red Steel, and I played the game for over six hours. To put it bluntly I gave this game more of a chance than it deserved. I never enjoyed myself remotely during the entire time. Then I realized why this was. It wasn't the bad controls, gameplay mechanics, storyline, graphics, and artificial intelligence. I recognized the game for what it truly was a first person shooter from over ten years ago with absolutely no polish. In other words I was swimming through crap only to find that the destination was a huge pile of crap.
There really wasn't much to actually redeem this game. Like I said a soundtrack, and the fact that you could make the controls work. Hard though it may sound some games cannot even bother to have working control schemes. Even more reprehensible is the fact that this game seemed to be designed to physically harm the player. Swinging your hands past one another at high speed. Almost an invitation to knuckle smacking fun. especially since the Wii when using the sensor bar is only tolerant of playing within a certain box. Which means your hands are already dangerously close when your going to fight the controls to pull off a special sword move.
I am just plain saddened to see anyone getting excited about this game, because the first game just wasn't any good. The real tragedy is better games will not get a sequel. |
I find it funny you try and measure the unnanounced sequel by the rushed merit of its launch predicessor, though I appreciate you trying to rain on its parade, if only you'd have acknowledged all Ubisoft games are just as shallow and poorly flushed out, but alas, I'm sure their HD endeavors are golden works of art. Most of your complaints actually sound like those of people speculating shortcommings for the Wii well before it was ever released. In the end you're just another person who doesn't get motion controls and tries to take comfort in the ever bottle-necking pool of games HD gaming is finding its niche in.
You should stick to posts where facts are involved, when it comes to opinions your credibility and debating skills disintigrate into unproductive rants. Know your strengths and weaknesses and pick and choose your battles. This is not yours to be had, try again later. While your posts against the PS3 are usually in regards to erroneous facts, your posts against the Wii are typically little more than unprovoked displays of contempt for the Wii's unique approach to the video game market.
I find it ironic that someone who only has the courage to re-emerge on these forums now that things look favorable for the 360 once more would be so pretentious as to lecture us, who have been here all along, on the merits of gameplay. Where was your lecturing and high & mighty standards during these past dark days for the 360 where you, like so many other 360 fanboys, were on a long and unexplained hiatus? You're all talk when things seem in favor of your brand of choice, but otherwise you've not even the courage to show your face on the forums.
Tell me, does it really worry you to think that people might be excited about a game, about a console, that you've nothing but contempt for? Tsk Tsk.