Some bad news for PS3 owners hoping for some improvements in the graphics department for upcoming shooter BioShock. Publisher 2K Games has confirmed to VideoGamer.com that it's concentrating on matching, not bettering the visuals seen in the Xbox 360 version.

She said: "We're looking to match the quality of the original version. We want to make sure that the water is just as great, and I think you can see from the demonstration, that it looks no different from the 360 version."

http://www.videogamer.com/news/22-07-2008-8885.html

Hw many more ports will it take to prove that the PS3 has too few advantages over the 360 to even be noticeable?

IT will never end Gebx.

There will never be more than a marginal difference in graphical capabilities between the PS3 and Xbox 360.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=34728

sounds dodgy, this article as well as a previous thread prove otherwise :s

http://www.psu.com/First-PS3-BioShock-screenshots-emerge--a0003802-p0.php

Forgive me, but I don't think a website called playstation universe is the most un-bias of places to use as a source. This conjecture really is pointless, lets just wait until its released and then see if its better or worse then the 360 version.

She said that just so 360 fans still have something to cling to after losing such an important exclusive

^its not that important anymore.

ps3 version is improved upon 360 version.

360 has lost its highest rated game ever

ps3 will soon be overtaking 360 in europe

japan down, europe down, only NA to go

ps. its always a laugh that xbox fanboys have videogamer.com and eurogamer.com to cling to

get ready for the delay.


( 500 post at last )

gebx thinks it is.

Do PS3 owners actually care about this game?  I mean, it filled a spot in a dry spell for 360 releases.  It can't compete with the likes of Resistance 2 and Killzone 2, so I'm not really sure why they are bothering to port it in the first place.