By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Why this generation has already been decided

RolStoppable said:

windbane, I don't want to argue with you anymore over and over again about the same points. We disagree on a lot of things, but can we agree that time will tell us soon (after this holiday season) in which direction this generation of consoles is heading? Can we also agree that time will tell us also how successful the PSP really is?

If we keep this debate going on we will find us in an endless loop refraining the same points again. I am tired of it.


Yeah, that's a good way to throw out my points. I agree that we disagreed on several things but it seemed to be winding to a close. Oh well, thanks for trying while you did.



Around the Network
Game_boy said:

I didn't say that. I said they ought to be the only console on the market based on simple economics.

 


 


That no really true. Economically, sometimes you have to invest heavily before seeing any kind of profit. It all depends on the planning but yes MS and Sony should have leaned a valuable lesson here. Consoles need to be cheaper and graphics only sell to a fraction of the market. The big piece of the pie just wants to have fun while playing a game, they could care less is the game looks like real life or not.

Celb said:
why are stupid ass threads like allowed to just keep going and going.

are any of you the kids of the energizer bunny ?

I assume you also complained about the elimination game threads?  Those aren't even conversations, unless I missed them in the tens of pages that just show who is posting uselessly more.  At least we were discussing something related to the forum's purpose as I understand it.  I don't read those threads, why complain or even read the posts (I assume you didn't) if you can just ignore it?



marc said:
Game_boy said:

I didn't say that. I said they ought to be the only console on the market based on simple economics.

 


 


That no really true. Economically, sometimes you have to invest heavily before seeing any kind of profit. It all depends on the planning but yes MS and Sony should have leaned a valuable lesson here. Consoles need to be cheaper and graphics only sell to a fraction of the market. The big piece of the pie just wants to have fun while playing a game, they could care less is the game looks like real life or not.

What about Gears of War?  That's a game I hear people complain about all the time due to the lack of story and faults of the online game, and yet it sold very well.  I guess it's the exception? 



RolStoppable said:
windbane said:

1. I never made any assumption about PS3 attach ratio. I've merely said that a lot of the demographic that Nintendo brags about, such as old people, won't be buying as many games going forward. So far, the Wii software is selling better, so maybe I'm wrong. I just think people are overreacting before the big 2nd half of the year.

2. You are ridiculous. So until a format is passing the previous format, you will give no thought to how successful it is? It took DVDs several years to overcome VHS in sales, and it was the year after the PS2 was released.

The public I talk to realizes that the Wii's only innovation so far is the controller and that many of the games are also on PS2. I'm pretty sure a lot of people realize that. But hey, I don't have poll numbers so I could be wrong.

3. So what if it takes years to offset lossses if you do indeed offset losses. Time will tell.

5. You need codes for certain aspects of online play from what I've heard. Please point out some games that you don't. I'm pretty sure that to play with your friends you have to exchange codes for each game, including charged. I know Charged has online play without it but it's limited to 2 versus 2 and that's only if both online players also have friends at their side. The high level play is with 4 players, and I'm not sure 4 versus the computer will be an option. I hope it is. I've said before that I might get my Wii to play the game because I consider it the hardest Mario game ever made until someone disputes that claim. I haven't played them all.

I was going to get a Wii for Manhunt 2, but that seems to have been delayed for now..*sigh*

6. The 360 and PS3 get multiplatform third party games announced all the time, such as Soul Calibur 4, The Darkness, Army of Two, and an endless number of others. Devil May Cry 3, Haze (PS3 exclusive this year, heh), Assassin's Creed, etc. Lots of them. I don't think the Wii will be the primary platform for many developers, even with the shifting of resources. I think the shifts will be games like EA's Playground aimed more for younger gamers. I expect more mini-game bananzas as well. And hey, the PS3 could use a mini-game title as well, so I'm not completely dissing the Wii...

7. The PSP hasn't trailed the Wii much in Europe the last several months. The only way you can say the PSP is a failure is if you directly compare it to the GB, GBA, DS, PS, PS2, and maybe the NES and SNES (time will tell).

In fact, here is a nice chart from last week in Europe/Others:

Total:

ConsoleWeeklyTotal
122,83114,085,444
70,7927,920,487
61,2732,229,330
22,8383,213,644
21,8831,023,604
Total299,617 

In fact, looking back, let me revise my claim: in the last few months the PSP has been outselling the Wii. I thought the Wii was going to win this generation? I guess that means the PSP isn't successful? Except that wouldn't make sense. Sony: the PSP is doing great.

7. Ok, we disagree.


1. Well, you made the assumption that more gamers (i.e. people that buy a console to play games) will choose the PS3 later on in its life. So far the attach ratio for the Wii is higher than the one for PS3, which makes me assume that quite a lot of people (especially in japan) didn't purchase the PS3 primarly to play games on it. The lack of games is not really an excuse, qualitywise the Wii software doesn't really offer more software than the PS3. In fact, if we go by reviews the PS3 has the better games.

2. I said until ONE single movie that is released on both, DVD and Bluray, hasn't got better sales on its Bluray version, there is no reason that Bluray has a chance to become the successor of the DVD. So far Bluray movies sales are way behind DVD sales, it's still a long way to go.

"The public I talk to..." - One person's experience or opinion not neccessarly shows the general consensus.

5. To play games with your friends you need friend codes, yes. It can't be that hard to enter a 16-digit-number. You may find it tiresome to enter it, but it's done within seconds, so it's not that big of a deal as many people try to make it look like. Without friend codes you can play on Charged either 1 vs. 1 or 2 vs. 2 (2 people on each console, not 4 random people). After you choose wifi from the main menu of Charged you get to a "lobby" screen where you can immediately see how many of your friends are online right now and who of them.

The delay of Manhunt 2 is a pity, but that is what you get on a console that allows for more immersive gameplay than ever before (the Wii controls are causing the delay). Now noticing that you don't own a Wii yet, why do you complain about a console and its online system so much without not having experienced yourself. There is a reason for "Playing is believing", you know.

6. There are lots of multiplatform announcements lately, yes. But they are not really for new games, merely for games that were originally planned to be exclusive on one console. Publishers expected both HD consoles to sell much better, but now that it is obvious that they don't sell as well as they thought, they have to go multiplatform to make money off of their games. How much faith developers really put into the Wii will be seen at this year's E3, Games Convention and Tokio game show.

7. First off, the Wii is not a handheld. To determine the PSP's success you have to compare it to its competition, the DS. Next, the PSP had a price cut this year and better games in its library than last year. Yet, it doesn't sell significantly better than compared to last year. On the other hand the DS sells clearly better than last year and is widening the gap to the PSP. Here's the weekly chart:

http://vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=PSP&reg1=All&cons2=DS&reg2=All&cons3=PSP&reg3=All&weekly=1

As many people have noticed the PSP software is selling at low levels in america. Considering the PSP's lacking hardware sales compared to the DS and especially the low attach ratio for software, developers will cut their support for the PSP rather soon.

Nice chart, the PSP outselling the Wii. But as I've said before the Wii isn't a handheld. The same way you have to compare the PSP to its competition, the DS, you have to compare the Wii to its competition, the 360 and PS3. Pretty clear picture in your chart, the Wii is outselling both competitors combined. Same in america. Same in japan. The two HD consoles combined have trouble to grow at the same rate as the Wii. As publisher you can't ignore this fact. The best selling platform (handheld or consoles) sooner or later will always become the primary platform to develop games for.

Sony's expections for the PSP were that it will crush the DS and that UMD becomes a viable format. In both ways the PSP isn't a success, it's quite the opposite: a complete failure. Sales for the PSP will slow down, the upcoming big games won't change that.


1. No reason why PS3 sales won't pick up. Great games coming, price cut this year most likely, and tons of exclusives and multis with the 360 that won't be on the Wii.

2. I'm just saying that just because a format hasn't taken over yet doesn't mean you can't see that it's heading towards it. There are some titles that have been in the top 10 in dvd sales and the number of players, number of tvs, and number of movies are increasing each week.

5. I can read and I've read everything I can find about Charged and the online service with it. I find friend codes annoying and Charged online options lacking, even if it's an improvement. I think Nintendo gets a pass for lacking good online features too much. It's almost as if just because they don't try as hard people don't expect as much.

As for Manhunt 2:  the controls don't have anything to do with it considering ther PS2 version also is delayed for the same reason of receiving an AO rating.  If it was released on the PS2 and not on the Wii, I'd just play it on the PS2.  I enjoyed Manhunt 1 there already. 

6. A lot of the games have been new announcements, but yeah, we'll get a glimmer of the future at E3.

7. When it comes to sales, you can compare whatever you want. The fact is that the PSP is selling better than the Wii in Europe. In no way do I have to compare the PSP only to the DS. If both are successful what difference does it make? The DS is crushing the PSP. Ok. The PSP is still beating the Wii and is as closer to the same price point than the Wii is to the 360.

There was a thread talking about which game would sell the most this year and Pokemon was thrown out by some because it was a handheld title. You can do that, but ignoring that it sells much more than any other doesn't make it untrue. Now, comparing revenue would be interesting since Pokemon is half the price of a 360 or PS3 game. If you consider that, it might not be the highest selling. Either way, it exists, so it still counts as a game being sold.

Handhelds don't sell more than consoles by default. The PS2 is the highest selling machine now. The GBA and GB are next but obviously there is not some magic thing about handhelds that discounts the fact that the PSP is outselling the Wii. The PSP is not as successful as the DS, but it is still a great success.

Btw, most of the best games are coming out later this year for the PSP (and this week with PQ2).

Finally, if you compare the GB and GBA to the DS (aligning launches), then neither the GB and GBA are successful by your definition. I think most would disagree. There are degrees of success, and the PSP is doing very well.



Around the Network

PS fanboy says "PS2 can trash all other consoles in the past + next gen war . PS3 is an early launch of next next gen!!"

Nintendo Fanboy replied "Nintendo can trash all consoles in accumlated hardware sold in history!!"

MS fanboy bragged "The total sales of Windows trashes the total sales of all consoles(Nintendo, Sony, Sega, Atari and etc) added together, even if you included XBOX series!"

Will it ever end?



RolStoppable said:
windbane said:

1) Sales numbers don't make it more right, it shows the public finds it more acceptable right now. The blu-ray drive does had value to a gamer but the total cost is simply too much for a lot of people. That internal flash memory sure doesn't last long if you download a lot of games, either. Gamers are already having to exchange cards and/or delete items to make room for games they want to play. I'd say the 60GB HD in the PS3 is also added gamer value, allowing more game installs for faster loading and more downloadable content (including games).

2) I'd rather buy a cheaper Wii that I can add a larger card or HD to, and I'd rather buy it without Wii Sports. I'd rather have pack-in hardware that will be utilized for a lot of my games rather than a pack-in game that I don't want. I think Wii Sports is a great selling point for the console because it's simple enough for anyone to play, but I don't think the thrill would last very long. Sales numbers say that the cheaper Wii is easier to swallow and Wii Sports probably sells a lot of consoles, but that doesn't make the pack-in any more justified to me.


1) Sales number show that the general public thinks the way as I have stated. If they would really think that the 360 or PS3 are of a higher value than what you get with a Wii, the price wouldn't play a role. The general gaming public thinks that the Wii has a better cost:value ratio than the 360 and PS3. See sales numbers.

The internal flash memory of the Wii allows you to store an estimated number of 40 virtual console games, this largely depends on the games you download (I have 12 VC games, they take up roughly a quarter of the flash memory). If you run out of space you buy either an SD card (1gig) for about $20 which allows you to store double as many games as on the flash memory or you simply delete the games on the Wii and download them again for free if you want to play them again.

2) One person's experience or opinion not neccessarly shows the general consensus.


On the PSN I can download demos that are larger than 1GB. I've used 40GB so far downloading demos, trailers, and games (new ones, not old games I can play on my PC, PS3, PSP, etc) as well as installing games. Most of that I can delete any time because I've just been lazy and kept them all on there (lots of movie trailers), but it's nice to be able to use that much storage. Also, I can get 500GB for $100 now and use that for my PS3. Not saying I don't like SD cards because I believe they are cheaper than memory sticks, but the Wii is limited so far.

Very few virtual console games will interest me due to the fact I can download them on my PC for free and play them on the PS3, PSP, and PC like I said. You say the public speaks for everything but there are no solid numbers of each download of Wii, PSN, and 360 games. Many PSN and Live games wouldn't fit on the Wii's internal memory, and some of the games that will end up on both services will not be able to be put on the Wii's network.

I don't think the limited internal memory is selling the console. You can't just argue that sales numbers justify everything being done with the Wii. The controller is pretty much carrying the sales right now. You are right by saying the reviews have been overall better for the PS3, and nearly everything else is better on the PS3 as well. The only thing the PS3 doesn't have is pointing detection, which it will have (and better) for Time Crisis 4.

The sales indicate the controller is fun and the price is cheap. We'll see how long that carrys it. I hope Metroid Prime can prove that the FPS controls are better than the analogs because although I thoroughly enjoyed Resistance both story mode and online, the dual analog system is not the best by a long shot.



Silver_Z said:
PS fanboy says "PS2 can trash all other consoles in the past + next gen war . PS3 is an early launch of next next gen!!"

Nintendo Fanboy replied "Nintendo can trash all consoles in accumlated hardware sold in history!!"

MS fanboy bragged "The total sales of Windows trashes the total sales of all consoles(Nintendo, Sony, Sega, Atari and etc) added together, even if you included XBOX series!"

Will it ever end?

Does this relate to anything we're discussing?  Not that I can tell... 



mrstickball said:
Nintendo is the only game company because thats all they are. For them, if Nintendo ever lost money, they'd go bankrupt. Sony and MS have the advantage of being able to lose money, and being able to recoup it.


 


Ummm.............................................do you know how much money Pokemon makes Nintendo?



 

  

 

Game_boy said:

It's all very well discussing unit sales, projections and price points, but in truth the seventh generation of video game consoles has already been decided.

Microsoft and Sony are massive corporations with over forty billion dollars of annal revenue and massive profits. In contrast, however, their game divisions each show significant and sustained losses - Microsoft ever since it entered the console market and Sony since the PS3 started to lose them $200 on each one sold and the PSP was a virtual flop against the DS.

This means that if it weren't for their other business, both companies would be dead and bankrupt already.

Nintendo, on the other hand, has always turned a large profit and has had their share value (and therefore how much money the market expects them to make) triple in 18 months due to the DS and Wii.

Result: If the market was fair and Sony and Microsoft couldn't afford to lose billions of dollars every year just to stay in the game market, Nintendo would be the only major competitor left.

I believe if sales continue their current trends Sony and Microsoft will give up and pull out of the console market altogether. I see no financial reason to stay in it for either company.

 

 


That's the dumbest reasoning I have ever heard.  Period.