LoL and looking at 11ht11 sig got me thinking next you haters will saying Fatal Frame4 for Wii looks like crap, or when it comes out be dissing the controls, or Suda hasn't made a commercially successful game yet! Then MadWorld will be crap cause it's B&W and Clover hasn't done action games, or there is no epic story line.

Then it will be Wario World Shake It "it's just more of the same from Ninty, too much waggle. Then it will be Mega Man 9 they should've upped the graphics, there's not a lot of options for the control schemes, it's too hard. Then it will be Project O it looks too kiddy, the gameplay isn't as deep as other JRPGS, and so on. Then it will be SpyBorgs looks kiddy, the graphics are meh, there's too much waggle during the commericials, doesn't look like anything core gamers can get into. Then it will be Dead Rising Wii oh it's just a stupid gimped port of the 360 version, Wii can't handle all the zombies on screen so therefore it sucks!

And on and on and on and on.

There ya go haters! I just helped outline your hate laced excuses for some of the top Wii exclusives (except for Mega Man 9 which is multi-plat). So you can get started on refining and sharpening your uninformed, biased opinions! Get to work do your job haters!

Montana is really trolling this thread. Saying that the game graphics suck since they are not PS3 quality puts him into one league with Rock_on and Crazzyman.

Welcome to the nether parts of trolling Montana, well done.

While the comment how it doesn't look as good as PS3/360 games probably wasn't needed, he's not trolling because there's nothing wrong with not  liking the look/style of the game and there's nothing wrong with calling a game uninspired.

@ twesterm: well then it merely puts him in the same "league" with Rock-On than made the last thread about the same topic - even identical arguments.

There is something wrong with claiming the game is surrounded by hypocritical fanboys, without any proof to back that up. In what ways are they supposed to be hypocritical?

And some of us are explicit in that the game is not original. It's just that the Wii isn't getting much of these games.

I agree with Monti.

This game would be generic by any game on the PS360s standards. Character models are very nice, but texture is uninspiring, as is the overall design of the game. But on the Wii it is different, because they don't have a plethora of shooting games to choose from, but if this game was a PS360 release, it wouldn't get a second thought, as we already have a flooded shooter market.

The same argument can be made for a number of shooters on the PS360 as well.  Many people say Resistance was popular only because it was a launch title with no other competition.

Duh. They wouldn't have even made the game if they didn't have the option to make it on the Wii. They likely would have found what games were needed on those systems and make them.

BTW, the textures are only that way now. They stated they wanted to get all the effects in first. The textures get more developed as the builds are shown.

Gears of War 2 was no competition?

Weird. 

Could have sworn that game came out November 2006.  Resistance had the problem with being on a failry unpopular system at that time, it's a hell of a game.  It hasn't aged well though.

I think he means competition as in other shooters released for the PS3 at the same timeframe.