Umbrella Chronicles was just a spin-off, it was certainly no RE5. If we're assuming the KH team is any good, then look at the better developers that made the Wii-mote transition, with games like Super Mario Galaxy or Metroid Prime 3.

@second bold, what's that about? The Wii demographic are not fat people needing to get into shape - I myself am the furthest thing from fat, and I'm sure most of the 2+ million in Japan that bought Wii Fit are similar. Gamers preferring motion control has to do with preference, not because they need a workout. I doubt there will be many moms playing any KH that comes on the Wii.

Anyway, I understand you might dislike motion control. Still, have you tried any of the better games for the Wii? Something like No More Heroes?  Not all games simply tack-on motion control like Zelda:TP did. We've been saying the game doesn't require mapping all attacks to motion, but using it only sparingly (special attacks, spells, or finishers, for example).

No I didn't at all, no one seems to understand IP ownership here, ok lets say Disney wanted to make KH1&2 on Wii and basically just a port, SE refuses to go along with it, SE has right to put an end to it, cause they published and developed KH1&2, BUT if Disney wanted to put KH3 on Wii and SE didn't go along with it, Disney could just say OK I don't want you to publish or develop the game, we won't use your FF characters, and then could just go to Nintendo and ask them to make KH3.  Do you finally understand?  Disney owns the IP, Disney AND SE own KH1&2.

Another example is why Goldeneye never went to XBL, Nintendo published Goldeneye meaning they have full rights to the code and that particular game in the James Bond series, they have the right to stop that game, they could not stop something else in the James Bond series, or have any right to it.  So to say SE has the right to the KH SERIES is like saying Nintendo could tell everyone to only produce the new James Bond games on Wii, it's completely absurd that any of you would think SE has this right.

No I didn't at all, no one seems to understand IP ownership here, ok lets say Disney wanted to make KH1&2 on Wii and basically just a port, SE refuses to go along with it, SE has right to put an end to it, cause they published and developed KH1&2, BUT if Disney wanted to put KH3 on Wii and SE didn't go along with it, Disney could just say OK I don't want you to publish or develop the game, we won't use your FF characters, and then could just go to Nintendo and ask them to make KH3.  Do you finally understand?  Disney owns the IP, Disney AND SE own KH1&2.

Another example is why Goldeneye never went to XBL, Nintendo published Goldeneye meaning they have full rights to the code and that particular game in the James Bond series, they have the right to stop that game, they could not stop something else in the James Bond series, or have any right to it.  So to say SE has the right to the KH SERIES is like saying Nintendo could tell everyone to only produce the new James Bond games on Wii, it's completely absurd that any of you would think SE has this right.

No I didn't at all, no one seems to understand IP ownership here, ok lets say Disney wanted to make KH1&2 on Wii and basically just a port, SE refuses to go along with it, SE has right to put an end to it, cause they published and developed KH1&2, BUT if Disney wanted to put KH3 on Wii and SE didn't go along with it, Disney could just say OK I don't want you to publish or develop the game, we won't use your FF characters, and then could just go to Nintendo and ask them to make KH3.  Do you finally understand?  Disney owns the IP, Disney AND SE own KH1&2.

Another example is why Goldeneye never went to XBL, Nintendo published Goldeneye meaning they have full rights to the code and that particular game in the James Bond series, they have the right to stop that game, they could not stop something else in the James Bond series, or have any right to it.  So to say SE has the right to the KH SERIES is like saying Nintendo could tell everyone to only produce the new James Bond games on Wii, it's completely absurd that any of you would think SE has this right.

Like you said, Goldeneye was published  by Nintendo, meaning they paid for the game for christ sake. Of course they get the say so of where that particular game can go. Yet GoldenEye is a liscense game, built off of another established property. Kingdom Hearts is a brand new IP between two companies that has already established characters and settings within the game. If the particular agreement in which the KH series is to change with the next installment then yes, it can go anywhere Disney wants. Yet as it stands it is a 50/50 split. The FF characters are just as much invested into KH lore as the Disney ones are. The main characters (Sora, Riku, Kairi, etc) are owned by Disney but Designed by Nomura. What would happen without him? The story simply could not go on. The story is within his head and nowhere else. He makes the characters that drive the plot. How can a game continue without that?

they can't.

since its a joint venture... publish and developed by square.

hell its so great because the director tetsuya nomura is behind it.

golden eye was developed by rare

lincensed by nintendo

they will ask nintendo do it and the main characters will be mario luigi and peach! =O.

they also will cancel pure!!!, because it won't bring them profits.

At the time Rare was owned by Nintendo, it was published by Nintendo, and licensed by Nintendo, but Nintendo doesn't own the rights to the 007 IP.  Again you don't seem to understand IPs, the IP is owned by Disney, SE published and developed KH1&2 which means they have their rights in what happens to ONLY KH1&2 not KH3 and predevelopmental state means everything is controlled by Disney, they decide what they want for the game, what console the game goes on, and they decide who they want to develop it in this process, SE being the developer could give their feedback usually where they want the game to go but Disney has the final word cause they could tell SE to screw off if they wanted.

And removing SE from KH would still leave KH minus FF characters, which were only side characters, you'd still have Organization XIII, Sora, Riku, the worlds, etc. the only thing you'd be missing is a few side characters that only have a minor part in the story.  If you really wanted to get into hypotheticals MS could very well develop and publish KH3 and use Master Chief in it, and it would mean MS has it's part of the rights to KH3 then.  So again Disney is the ultimate say in the series of KH, the developer and publisher has it's say, but the developer and publisher could change if push came to shove, and Disney just 100% drop SE if SE didn't want to go along with Disneys ideas.