shio said:
greenmedic88 said: Put into perspective, a 40GB PS3 only costs $150 more than a Wii.
It's still more than most are willing to pay for a console, but once you have the console, the only thing you're paying for are games. |
Games that are 10$-30$ more expensive than PC games, not forgetting the fact that PC games drop their prices much faster than console games.
greenmedic88 said:
Even at $10 more per title on average, you'd have to buy ten games to even add up to a $100 difference.
Truth is, the vast majority of console owners don't even buy ten games over the lifetime of the console. And that total typically includes discounted games. By the time most consoles go to mass consumer pricing, there are budget priced titles as there are with the 360 currently.
And that brings up the other aspect of console gaming; the consoles themselves become cheaper, which not coincidentally is when sales figures for hardware tend to pick up.
When I can pick up another PS3 for under $300, or a 360 for $200, that won't buy me a PC; it will buy me a decent video card.
|
Do you only buy 10 games every generation? If you do, then just build a decent $500 PC and tadaaa, it gets cheaper than PS3/360!!! And many great PC games are released with a lower price than $50 (Crysis Warhead for example, Sins of a Solar Empire, Sam & Max, etc...).
The Average PC gamer also doesn't upgrade and only buys $10-$20 PC games.... so where does lead us?
If you think you need $200 to buy a decent GPu, then it just shows how you don't know much about PC gaming.
PC usually is cheaper in the long run if you buy a decent amount of games, and will be used for a longer period than consoles, especially today. My brother still uses the same PC to play games after 5 years and has played several recent and great PC games.
Consoles are getting more expensive, PC's are getting cheaper, and life goes on.
|
Clearly we are in different budget ranges when it comes to sourcing parts. A 4850 would be a great $200 card and a 4870 would be a great $300 card. Not exorbitantly priced at all. Arguably the best price to performance seen yet in the PC gaming world.
I'm just a little tired of hearing "budget" and "runs Crysis at High settings" in the same flipping sentence when those who know anything about PC gaming know full well that's an oxymoron. So what? Run high settings at minimal resolution with no AA? What's the point?
Consoles start expensive with every generation and then become cheaper with every passing year. By the time the last generation was winding down, every console was under $200 and had sizable libraries of cheap games in addition to exclusives that continued to push the hardware.
PC components, particularly the video cards, which for all intents and purposes ARE the console within the PC, keep getting cheaper in addition to getting faster (although there is always a market for $500+ premium consumer video cards), but the minimum specs keep changing every year as well when it comes to resource heavy games that in effect sell new video cards.
You want to grandfather a PC for 5 years and tell me it plays Crysis on high, go ahead and make that claim. I'm typing this on a 4 year old Powerbook, but I don't use it for gaming. The PC I use for gaming on the other hand, will be replaced in 2-3 years at the most if I'm still inclined to keep gaming on PC. I'd build one anyway for video and photo editing even if I only found myself buying a small handful of PC games.