Homosexuals have to impose their views on others if they to ever have acceptance/peace.

Definition : To establish or apply as compulsory; levy: impose a tax.

Therfore they cannot "live happies lives without being chased by everyone" without doing so , in order for the homosexual to argue against traditional values and norms i'm guessing they'd argue their freedom to choose what they feel is best for them , what the are entitled to as human beings . I argued in response to this that the peadophile or rapist would equally be entitled to argue his freedom to choose and decide what is best for him , it doesn't matter wether people get hurt from it , freedom.

Define : The condition of being free of restraints.

means that we depart from our traditional values and accept that everyone is entitled to do what they feel is best for them , you can't accept the homosexual man is free to be homosexual yet deny the peadophile the freedom to carry out his own activies unless you accept that we should ony allow  freedom to the extent which is convenient for the majority .

Multi Tasking (at least where i'm from) means doing various tasks simaltaneously , it does trip me up occasionaly yes.

Kasz216 said:

In a "perfect" christian society there would be no laws based. Remember "turn the other cheek".

It's God's job to sort it all out. Not Man's.

By focusing on other peoples sin's you take your focus off your own very many and vast sins.

Judgement of others in of itself is a sin. There is only 1 true judge.

In a "perfect' Christian world even thigns like muder would be legal. However we really can't work like that being flawed and still fearing such things despite the fact that we shouldn't.

As such said precedent makes the most sense.

I never said I was perfect , i'm far from it but I would hope I wouldn't fight to do that which contradicted what I believed him .There are various passages in the bible that condem homosexual behaviour it's just that people choose to ignore this for their own convenience or say "at least i'm not killing or raping little kiddies".

I think it's our roles as christians (we are even encouraged) to identify areas where we need to improve and better ouselves , I'm not judging the gay individual when I say homosexuality is wrong in the same way i'm not judging the thief when I say stealing is wrong , according to what I believe these things have already been established ( AKA Aprior).

Do you realise that "gay marriage" doesn't even make sense ? by defintion a marriage is a union between a man and a woman ?

Multi Tasking (at least where i'm from) means doing various tasks simaltaneously , it does trip me up occasionaly yes.

Kasz216 said:

In a "perfect" christian society there would be no laws based. Remember "turn the other cheek".

It's God's job to sort it all out. Not Man's.

By focusing on other peoples sin's you take your focus off your own very many and vast sins.

Judgement of others in of itself is a sin.  There is only 1 true judge.

In a "perfect' Christian world even thigns like muder would be legal.  However we really can't work like that being flawed and still fearing such things despite the fact that we shouldn't.

As such said precedent makes the most sense.

I never said I was perfect , i'm far from it  but I would hope I wouldn't fight to do that which contradicted what I believed him .There are various passages in the bible that condem homosexual behaviour it's just that people choose to ignore this for their own convenience or say "at least i'm not killing or raping little kiddies".

I think it's our roles as christians (we are even encouraged) to identify areas where we need to improve and better ouselves , I'm not judging the gay individual when I say homosexuality is wrong in the same way i'm not judging the thief when I say stealing is wrong , according to what I believe these things have already been established ( AKA Aprior).

Do you realise that "gay marriage" doesn't even make sense ? by defintion a marriage is a union between a man and a woman ?

That's your religious definition.  The legal definition is changing around the world.  The government has to allow marriage for everybody or nobody.  Religion doesn't have to, but religion can't tell the government how to define anything.

Marriage started as a way to exchange property between men and to keep it from women, and as a way to make sure your wife only had your babies and nobody else would sneak in and get her pregnant.

Define : The condition of being free of restraints.

means that we depart from our traditional values and accept that everyone is entitled to do what they feel is best for them , you can't accept the homosexual man is free to be homosexual yet deny the peadophile the freedom to carry out his own activies unless you accept that we should ony allow  freedom to the extent which is convenient for the majority .

Marriage originated from religion as far as my understanding goes , the world your looking for is "civil partnership" , not marriage.

Marriage originated from religion as far as my understanding goes , the world your looking for is "civil partnership" , not marriage.