By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - which time we will see PC technology reach its limit ?

thats what i want to know .. cuz every month we hear of a new processor or a new VGA card better than the previous one and thats make u confused. for me i think its will be soon cuz now development face some difficultes like the heat problem so what do u think ??

 



Around the Network

As it currently is designed and ran? Probably in the next 10 years.

When will computers stop progressing as they are? Never. We will at least in our life times and probably our kids and their kids life times always find new ways to increase speed, lower size and run it with fewer parts.



I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.

This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:

"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"

"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"

"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"

Science never stops growing.



The current miniaturization process is certainly reaching its potential within the next 20-25 years or so but advancements in other areas have already opened up new avenues which have been the subject of study and development for almost a decade now.

Even if everything we are looking at now doesn't pan out the LHC will soon be completed and we will continue to probe ever deeper in our attempts to find the fundamental "particle". I put quotes around particle because a point-particle quantum framework is looking less and less likely these days.

In short, one way or another technology will continue to advance, but that doesn't mean it will be at the rate it has been for the last 40 years. It could very well be slower and it might even be faster..although that seems significantly less likely.



To Each Man, Responsibility

When computers are able to run Matrix-like simulations that are as real as real can get then our simulation will be shut down.



Around the Network

let them give us a brake atleast. no need to rush the technology on us.



"640K is all you need."



Sqrl said:
The current miniaturization process is certainly reaching its potential within the next 20-25 years or so but advancements in other areas have already opened up new avenues which have been the subject of study and development for almost a decade now.

Even if everything we are looking at now doesn't pan out the LHC will soon be completed and we will continue to probe ever deeper in our attempts to find the fundamental "particle". I put quotes around particle because a point-particle quantum framework is looking less and less likely these days.

In short, one way or another technology will continue to advance, but that doesn't mean it will be at the rate it has been for the last 40 years. It could very well be slower and it might even be faster..although that seems significantly less likely.

 

Advances in hardware are 90% die shrinks and 10% brainpower. Every new generation has roughly double the number of transistors available for the same production cost and power use.The 'limit' of such scaling is about 20 years away and has been since transistors were invented - new technologies for even smaller scales using smallerparticles (or as sqrl points out, more likely smaller space-time constructs like strings) are being investigated.

As for how far we can take advantage of technology, pretty much something like The Matrix is the most we need: something that can real-time process ALL sensory inputs and outputs for the entire body of every human being to a resolution equal to the real world. Probably evolutionary algorithms are needed too, to evolve an AI capable of designing the program needed.

 



i think Matrix thing is near impossible.



NNN2004 said:
i think Matrix thing is near impossible.

 

Well the idea of being able to launch into space was considered near impossible not too long ago.