Omac said:
I think you've been smoking to much. |
dont judge other people by your condition
Omac said:
I think you've been smoking to much. |
dont judge other people by your condition
disolitude said:
lol man. I really don't understand why im replying to this as its got more holes than swiss cheese. Are you saying there is no FMV in MGS4? How about the bigging commercials, or the scenes with egg cooking, or how about the parts when they explain plot or scenes form old metal bear movies. That is in game engine too right? You are saying sound can't be compressed? There have been a much smarter people than you and me discussing graphics on this thread so I will leave that part alone... |
you asked for a link where it says a 50gb blu ray is used, i want link where it says nothing is compressed, cus you are asuming everything is uncompressed
NJ5 said:
That quote is very old, in the meantime Kojima has already changed his mind to say he had overestimated the PS3 hardware. I don't remember him specifically saying it could be done on the 360 though. The one I'm talking about is this one:
"
|
interesting cus this is nwer than the one you got
http://kotaku.com/5008653/americans-brag-ps3-no-letdown-kotaku-is-wrong
siriguillo said:
dont judge other people by your condition |
I'm judging you by your pot leaf as an avatar. Also I believe uncharted could be ported and look identical, but we will never see it on 360 to do a caparison. But we could on MGS4, we will have to see.
@ NJ5
psrock said: anything is possible, but i doubt it would happen. Do xbox fans want this game? |
I don't have a 360 or a PS3 yet, but when I buy a 360 in the next few months I would very much like to have Metal Gear Solid 4 on it. Otherwise it will be much, much longer before I'm able to play it.
siriguillo said:
interesting cus this is nwer than the one you got |
What kind of massive translation failure would have to happen to explain the part "we're using the Cell to its limit"? It's followed by "I'm not criticizing the PS3", but the point is still there.
That later news item seems to me like pure damage control, but to each his own...
EDIT - Actually, the later news item not only does some damage control, but it ends up repeating the same thing in different words:
"Let's say this developer is making hardware, in this case a game, and that hardware is at the level of a car. And when looking at the specs, the developer claims the car is able to fly. Now there is no stopping when you say, "This is a car that can fly." When you claim that it can fly, the speculation grows from "oh so it can FLY?!!!" And the developer would set his goals higher. The specualtion is that if the car flies, then it should reach a MACH speed...but it doesnt stop there...it'd go beyond the specualtion of then "it should go into space!" with all the excitement around, and the developer would go deeply into making the car going into space... however, he'll come up to the public and say the car reaches the MACH speed, but it fails to go into the space. But he shouldn't give up, because for a car to even reach a mach speed and go into air is revolutionary. I wished to convey my thoughts like that, but I guess it didn't work very well."
No matter how much we want to read into it, even in this new text he's still saying that he had overestimated the PS3. If this was intended as damage control, it totally failed. Translation problems indeed...
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
Omac said:
I'm judging you by your pot leaf as an avatar. Also I believe uncharted could be ported and look identical, but we will never see it on 360 to do a caparison. But we could on MGS4, we will have to see.
|
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/28090.html
watch the review guess they smoke pot too, they are bias and even they says is better looking, by the way i picked that avatar randomly.
NJ5 said:
What kind of massive translation failure would have to happen to explain the part "we're using the Cell to its limit"? It's followed by "I'm not criticizing the PS3", but the point is still there. That later news item seems to me like pure damage control, but to each his own... EDIT - Actually, the later news item not only does some damage control, but it ends up repeating the same thing in different words: "Let's say this developer is making hardware, in this case a game, and that hardware is at the level of a car. And when looking at the specs, the developer claims the car is able to fly. Now there is no stopping when you say, "This is a car that can fly." When you claim that it can fly, the speculation grows from "oh so it can FLY?!!!" And the developer would set his goals higher. The specualtion is that if the car flies, then it should reach a MACH speed...but it doesnt stop there...it'd go beyond the specualtion of then "it should go into space!" with all the excitement around, and the developer would go deeply into making the car going into space... however, he'll come up to the public and say the car reaches the MACH speed, but it fails to go into the space. But he shouldn't give up, because for a car to even reach a mach speed and go into air is revolutionary. I wished to convey my thoughts like that, but I guess it didn't work very well." No matter how much we want to read into it, even in this new text he's still saying that he had overestimated the PS3. If this was intended as damage control, it totally failed. Translation problems indeed...
|
ok lest say you are right. Well the 360 have been out for 2.5 years by now, if it has the same power(or more) than the ps3, why games on the 360 don’t look 10x better, its easier to program on, and the gpu is better? By the time the ps2 was 2.5 years old games looked great. Why some ps3 games look equal or better than 360 games, if as your are saying the 360 has the same power or more?, how come? The ps3 is 1 year short, why is it that there is nothing on 360 that make everyone say, "ok this is unreachable, this is what next gen is about"? The 360 had everything in it favor.