EITHER: Nintendo buys exclusives (1), or it doesn't (2)
1:
Nintendo has less money to make their own games, leading to fewer games and fewer potential marketable IPs created.
Nintendo needs a certain amount of that game to sell for it to be profitable for them
-- or --
2:
Nintendo gets to invest in new studios, IPs, games, random ideas, etc. with their money, where they have much greater control over quality, etc.
Any 3rd party game that sells is automatically profitable for Nintendo.

I know which I would choose, in their position...

They should just buy Square Enix and the console war is over forever.

 Update: Nintendo and Square kiss and make up. /end console war

i think they should buy,just like microsoft and sony,but i dont think they will

 They already have, but they aren't monogamous. Sony is pissed off at square, but squares trying to please sony XIII and Versus. 

 Um sorry you said what? Buy microsot and sony? Nintendo has alot of money , but not enough to buy one of them. 

Well.............. looking how Nintendo has the leadership, it certainly doesn't need that.


Although it could be a good thing. It's always better prevent than giving medicine.

competitors flock to money, 3rd parties wont stand for Nintendo eating the whole cake.

Would be cool if nintendo force licensed them to their console again, then I'd laugh so hard, but that probably wont happen unless Nintendo is left to eat the whole cake of a userbase of 50 million next year...

I just realized that, if Wii is selling 5 million per 'AAA' game with 25 million.... ouch.... that's a lot of counting.

If I were Nintendo, I would save 50% of the money as a war chest, use 5% to increase production, 5% as a pay increase, and 40% to open new stuidoes and recruit very talented people. They need a stuido that works on FPSes and another that works on RPGs...

 Developed by a subsidary of Konami, not by Nintendo.