naznatips said:
Bored4life said:
Capcom has given us ports and Sven has lied to us about Okami.
There has been talk about giving us 2 crap games for a long while now,so I'm not going to be impressed until they show me something that current Wii owners care about.
I've been to the Ask Capcom boards and seen his posts.
He's a snake.Don't ever trust this fag.
Capcom started talking about unified online between the HD consoles and the PC recently and Lo and Behold! SF4 gets released for those systems.
I wonder what made them do that?
Remember the Capcom5?
Don't be suprised when RE5 doesn't appear on Wii despite passing their stupid test with flying colours. |
This makes no sense. First, how were we lied to about Okami? Also, please don't use the word "fag" on these forums. SF4 was only made for the Arcade by Capcom. The console and PC port was handled by Dimps. It is a cheap and dirty port. They made the game for their Japanese arcade audience. They only ported it to the 360 and PS3 because they were able to outsource the port fairly cheap since the hardware wasn't too far off the arcade hardware. Even so there is an unannounced 4th platform for the game that could be the Wii. Why would RE5 be on the Wii? Why do people expect developers to redo everything they've been working on for 3 or 4 years suddenly because the Wii is successful? Of course they won't. This is an unfortunate generation because the dev cycle for a big game is 3-5 years. That means 90% of these games you are seeing now and complaining aren't on the Wii began at best a year before the Wii even launched. The BG&E dev said he'd been working on it for more than 2 years. Again, why would you expect a Wii version given what the market looked like 2 years ago? Look to the future for Wii support. Not the past. Look for new franchises and new development after these old HD projects are complete, and be thankful for those who do manage to start a major Wii project like Capcom with Monster Hunter 3. |
On Okami:
Wii owners were told that they were getting extra content,that the game wouldn't be rushed and that they were really going to push it so that the game would receive the sales it deserved and wouldn't take the opinion of PS2 owners since they themselves allowed the game to flop(their own words).
What happened.Confirmed to be rushed on the Capcom forums.Then Sven himself said that no extra content would be added with the silly excuse that PS2 owners were actually asking for the game to be shorter in order to explain the rush without realizing that he contradicts the "PS2 opinions" comment.And in the end stays mum and closes threads immediately when people point out that even Nintendo Power recommended the PS2 version
On RE5:
Thanks to this test a lot of Wii owners who weren't even going to bother with the spinoff bought it and it sold well beyond their expectations as a result.And then you expect Wii owners not to be pissed when they say "jus kiddin guyz"
This has nothing to do with the Wii wins so it gets all the games mentality.Or did you forget this small detail that's constantly being brought up for months.
Please.
I gave facts.Even the SF4 comments fit into their previous comments.Everything is there on the net for you to see.
Prediction:
Disney will make KH3 with Nintendo.Yes,KH3 will be a Disney/Nintendo crossover.
Save the industry,Kill a Hardcore gamer
Stopped buying Ubisoft games.Will not buy Red Steel 2.Let them struggle on HD. Click here for a solution:CLICK
ALERT: I have also exposed a UBI'Z'OFT viral marketer in THIS thread.Read my posts, see the set up and watch how everything crumbles on page 8. Please learn from this experience.
