Minimum:

GFX: GeForce 7/8 Series of Radeon 1000/2000 with 256Mb RAM
CPU: Pentium 4
RAM: 1Gb
Internet: ADSL 1 MBit

Average (to run the game decently):

GFX: GeForce 8000 of Radeon 2000 series with 512Mb RAM
CPU: Core 2 Duo or Athlon X2
RAM: 2Gb
Internet: ADSL 3 Mbit

High-end:

GFX: Geforce 9000er or Radeon 3000er Series
CPU: Core 2 Duo 3 Ghz or Athlon X2
RAM: 2Gb with DualChannel mode.

-------------

Looks like I fall right in between average and high-end with;

Geforce 8800Gt, 3Gb ram and AMD Phenom Quadcore @ 2.66Ghz, 20Mbit ADSL.

-------------

'Yes, I can play Starcraft II when it comes out!!!'.

 Those are higher then I would have expected.

Those specs aren't confirmed. It could very well be false, which probably is.

And if it's true, then those are very, very low specs. Should run on 6 year old PC's when it comes out.

Those seem pretty high, they are Crysis type requirements.

Eehrm... The high-end specs are pretty sick if you ask me... Requires an expensive set-up

And, it's kinda odd that an RTS has such high specs... But hey, if I can play it I honestly don't care! ... 

This is why I never get to play any PC games, because if I do I have to put them on super ultra low settings while sacrificing a goat and praying to Satan that my computer doesn't crash. *sigh*

 Well since the game has been in development for longer than that, I'm not really suprised.

I wouldn't be surprised that it wants such a high end PC to run. It is running in a true 3D space with literally hundreds of models being drawn at the same time and quite possibly a shit-ton of particle effects also being drawn at the same time.

Eh?? If those specs are true, then you can run Starcraft 2 on a $200 PC today, play recommended settings on a $350 PC, and play high settings on a $450 PC Today, let alone when it comes out.  

 What is with you people?

you avatar confuses the crap out of me, largedarryl. I didn't remember typing that post and was like wtf then I remembered you have a similar avatar