Best FPS coming out this year that no one is talking about...

windbane

Currently Offline

5,042

4386 posts since 13/02/07

Recent Badges:

Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.

windbane on 20 May 2008

I enjoyed F.E.A.R. on PS3 despite its supposdly bad port.

disolitude

Currently Offline

87,040

14997 posts since 13/01/08

Recent Badges:

Some Here, Some There Bank a Total of 5,000 VG$.
One Small 'Splosion Author of 100 forum threads.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.
15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.

disolitude on 20 May 2008

Kratos said:

selnor said:
F.E.A.R was ok, but it wasnt in the same league as Halo, Half-Life and Bioshock. It was to sparce, and the slow-mo got annoying. Like most slo-mo games do. Corridor shooters that stay inside are old hat.

Fear is easily better than halo, because it is damn close to half-life in my opinion, shooter wise. Nothing tops halflife of course :P. People should stop saying Halo is one of the best games evah!!!. Halo was awesome, halo 2 was good, multiplayer awesome, Halo 3 meh, multiplayer good.

I think the current appeal of halo is attributed to a lot of people discovering it with part 3 as those people had PS2's not xboxes last gen and didn't play Halo1 and 2. I think both Halo's were on top of the shooter genre when they came out...3 is a notch lower maybe but it has more polish than the other 2 and I think thats what they were going for.

So I would still put Halo up there...alongside halflife 2 series...and if this game is anything like the first one...the FEAR series.