By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kratos said:
selnor said:
F.E.A.R was ok, but it wasnt in the same league as Halo, Half-Life and Bioshock. It was to sparce, and the slow-mo got annoying. Like most slo-mo games do. Corridor shooters that stay inside are old hat.

Fear is easily better than halo, because it is damn close to half-life in my opinion, shooter wise. Nothing tops halflife of course :P. People should stop  saying Halo is one of the best games evah!!!. Halo was awesome, halo 2 was good, multiplayer awesome, Halo 3 meh, multiplayer good.


I think the current appeal of halo is attributed to a lot of people discovering it with part 3 as those people had PS2's not xboxes last gen and didn't play Halo1 and 2. I think both Halo's were on top of the shooter genre when they came out...3 is a notch lower maybe but it has more polish than the other 2 and I think thats what they were going for.

So I would still put Halo up there...alongside halflife 2 series...and if this game is anything like the first one...the FEAR series.