| BMaker11 said: ... "a 10 should be awarded if you play a game, throughoughly enjoy it, and after playing it look back and go, wow, I can find nothing wrong with that experience, it was enjoyable through every aspect. I'm tired of innovation being the new guide for a games quality -_-; what happened to people just enjoying great games? Sequels get trashed this day in age because they don't "reinvigorate" the market, seriously who gives a shit? Some people tire of playing the same thing over and over, but some of us love sticking to something that works, I don't care how played out certain things can be, as long as they're a blast to play then whats the problem?" ~ ChronotriggerJM ....sorry for the rant, but what he said in accordance to this game got me thinking..... |
it's not really the point of your thread but i disagree. A 10 should be reserved for a revolutionary game and a revolutionary game only - something completely fresh and in fact perfect hence the perfect score.
What we should do as gamers is stop bitching and whining that a game "only" scored and 85. I'd rather see a larger spread on game scores. 0-3 horrible and flawed, 3-5 bad or generic, 5-8 a high quality game but not a standout, 8-10 ridiculously awesome and sure to be a classic.










Next Gen

