You can't compare mhz between these processors because their architecture is for the most part, completely different. It's comparing apples, oranges, and watermelons.
Nobody is crazy enough to accuse me of being sane.
Wow...just wow, Kwaad. I don't even know what to say, except that you should thank the FSM that this forum isn't very big. I mean, you are pretty much 100% flat out wrong. You just don't know what the hell you're talking about. I can't believe you actually think you could come onto a forum even this big and get away with such blatant and obvious lies. The Xbox was the most powerful of the last-gen console, followed closely by the GC, and with PS2 a distant 3rd. I...I... I'm (almost) speechless. I mean, you're actually serious, aren't you? I could see this being some part of an elaborate joke, but somehow I know it isn't. I love VG Charts. I check it just about every day if I have time, and I'd really like this forum to get good, but as long as posters like you are given free reign to spew your bullshit all over it, I don't see that happening. Do me a favor. I am on the Ars Technica forums. Make yourself an account, and just copy and paste some of your posts from here to see the kind of response you deserve with this complete and utter bullshit.
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt. -Mark Twain
2004 Lincoln LSV8 - ~$15,000
K&N Cold Air Intake - $300
Handheld ECU Reprogrammer - $400
The look on a ricer's face when they get their ass beat off the line by a Lincoln - Priceless
GameCube
PSN ID: Kwaad
I fly this flag in victory!
You're picking a few select pieces out of a whole puzzle, Kwaad. Put'em back and look at the whole overall picture. ;) Those numbers are at most relevant when dealing with the same architecture, the bigger the differences in architecture, the worse it is to compare them on those merits alone. Example : The Gamecube has a far better cache-design system on the processor as well as a better memory setup overall (Rambus had a lot of bandwidth BUT HORRIBLE LATENCY). I'm not a pro at this, but I've been reading about processors/chipsets/graphics cards long enough to know a decent amount of stuff, and you're simply not considering enough factors.
Nobody is crazy enough to accuse me of being sane.
Beleive what you want. http://cube.ign.com/articles/086/086984p1.html Look at what developers have to say. *shrug* Straight power easily gotten. GC wins. Optmized power... PS2 wins by a landslide. So for a Port. GC wins. (however if I'm not mistaken most multiplatform games were PS2 > X-box/cube. As the cube's bruteforce power, and X-Box's brute force power, can do it. While the PS2 has to be optimized. I fell the most imporant thing on a game console is optimization/results. Meaning a optimized PS2 can pull almost as much power as a x-box. And the Cube has a little more than the PS2.. (un-optimized) However if you make a game, and you dont optimize at all... you should stop makeing games. That is one reason I'm so intrested in the PS3's end result power. It's CPU is capable of so much more than anything else. Optimized for the PS3, can yeild probibally 2 or 3x power of the 360. When the best looking last gen game, looks better than anything I've ever seen on the Wii. That tells me the PS2 has more power/ability than a un-optimized Wii. However, a Wii is already optimized, as it runs a glorifyed GC chipset. Meaning it's just a fast GameCube. The Wii is GameCube2.0 Because of that, the Wii is already close to it's high end graphics. (except psycho optimized games like RE4) And Nintendo does not optimize as good as Capcom did RE4. ;0 The most imporant thing on a console are the games. Even beyond the hardware. Everyone admits that. Also, Looking up hardware specs on the Gamecube makes me laugh. because everyone said the same thing about the GameCube. 'It's gonna beat the PS2, it will at least take a good market share.' All I have to say is... ROFL 20million is one hell of a market share. VG charts dosent show x-box. But compared to the PS2... that is under 20% market share... ONLY agianst the PS2. Oh well. History repeats itself. :)
PSN ID: Kwaad
I fly this flag in victory!
Essentially the article you linked says that the processor power is about even, with the exception of the gamecube being significantly easier to program for, and the gamecube has a easier to use graphical setup that supports higher texture quality than the PS2.
Nobody is crazy enough to accuse me of being sane.