vanguardian1 on 04 February 2007
You're picking a few select pieces out of a whole puzzle, Kwaad. Put'em back and look at the whole overall picture. ;) Those numbers are at most relevant when dealing with the same architecture, the bigger the differences in architecture, the worse it is to compare them on those merits alone. Example : The Gamecube has a far better cache-design system on the processor as well as a better memory setup overall (Rambus had a lot of bandwidth BUT HORRIBLE LATENCY). I'm not a pro at this, but I've been reading about processors/chipsets/graphics cards long enough to know a decent amount of stuff, and you're simply not considering enough factors.
Nobody is crazy enough to accuse me of being sane.
