$$ = Power
I've been wondering that too,
but I see almost everyone here says it was the $
trestres said:
lol, GTA4 killed your PS3, I dont know if a game with that kind of technical issues could get a 10 if it wasnt for cash. YOU should be upset. |

Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!
Money money money money.......MONEY! Gamespot reviews no longer contain a shred of credibility. Changing GTA4's rating just solidified that fact.
Figures that my 100th post is right on the money. I used to love GS.......
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
I think calling GTA 4 the best game ever is a little overdoing it.
ckmlb said:
Get over it, GTA IV is gonna score higher than your precious Zelda. |
Looks like some1 is upset, chill out dude, life is great outside GTA4. I mean life exists outside it, though GTA4 is a good simulator.
And no, it wont.
Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.
tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."
Bets with Conegamer:
Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.
ckmlb said:
Get over it, GTA IV is gonna score higher than your precious Zelda. |
Calm down. I would hate for you to get really upset when the reviews impacted by the embargo start to come out and they're less than stellar. It's not always about slaying the big bad Zelda.
I am SuperLloyd!
(Im)patiently awaiting the Dawn of the New World!
trestres said:
Looks like some1 is upset, chill out dude, life is great outside GTA4. I mean life exists outside it, though GTA4 is a good simulator. And no, it wont. |
It already did. GTA4 = 25 reviews with a 100% and OoT = 22 reviews with 99%
The best way to review a game is to play it. Though the score changing is shady. Those video reviews are good because you can see the gameplay and they show you what cool stuff is in the game.

Viper1 said:
I call complete BS. A website doesn't just go live on its own. I've used publishing queues and know enough network administration to get a good chuckle out of this one.
EDIT: So he intitially had it at 9.5 but a peer committee that wasn't reviewing the game convinced him it was a 10? WTF? |
See this is why I have been thinking gamespots review is off. Technical difficulties I can half buy I guess, but it seems weird that it would suddenly occur to him that the flaws don't really hurt the game at all. I just can't trust Gamespot after it came out that internally it was thought whatshisname got fired for giving a bad review score. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant if the reviewers who work there think it is true.