Gnizmo on 03 May 2008
Viper1 said:
I call complete BS. A website doesn't just go live on its own. I've used publishing queues and know enough network administration to get a good chuckle out of this one.
EDIT: So he intitially had it at 9.5 but a peer committee that wasn't reviewing the game convinced him it was a 10? WTF? |
See this is why I have been thinking gamespots review is off. Technical difficulties I can half buy I guess, but it seems weird that it would suddenly occur to him that the flaws don't really hurt the game at all. I just can't trust Gamespot after it came out that internally it was thought whatshisname got fired for giving a bad review score. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant if the reviewers who work there think it is true.
