this is a horrible comparison. if there comparing the games then whatever, ps3 got shitty ports but if there saying the ps3 itself suffers bad graphics and stuff its a bad comparison. youll see at the end of this year.

im sorry EuroGamer is just as bad as GT and Kotaku.

Considering everyone knows the DMC4 looks better on the PS3 then the 360.. Burnout does, GTA4 does, and other games that had a dedicated development team or started working with the PS3 version and ported the game to the 360 have proven to looks better or have less issues on the PS3.

 Eurogamer said the ps3 version of burnout has the slight edge...

I don't see any bias here. 

There have been many bullshit "comparisons" on other sites as well, most notably Gamespot who really took a long and deep plunge with some of their moronic conclusions. "We decided not to use HDMI cables since the 360 version we used did not have a gate for it." ?
I prefer to see the difference right before me rather than read someones rant on it (someone who could've been paid by either company for all I know).
Besides; the difference (where such is indeed present) lies in platform exclusives. I don't get why so many expect one version to grossly outperform the other on multiplats...

Comparisons like these will always said to be biased.
As the people that want to view them are vocal supporters of the console they have brought to see if it has the edge over the competition. When this doesn't happen, it's called a lie.

It's a good thing the new multiplats are becoming so identical that there will be no point to have comparison sites soon.

There is no fun seeing 2 pictures of different console renderings of a game that look identical.