By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Is nintendo the winner of the 8th gen or the 9th gen?

 

Is the switch an 8th gen console

Yes its 8th gen 19 41.30%
 
Yes its 9th gen 27 58.70%
 
Total:46
angrypoolman said:
Chrkeller said:

All of them since 2003.  PC is the biggest market and Steam is the biggest provider.  

Consoles are like Kobe vs LeBron, fighting over scraps while everyone knows Jordan is the GOAT.

It puts you at 1 championship at best. Really it should be zero because PC is not part of the console race.

True.  The consoles are racing while PC is sitting back with its gold medal sipping some victory wine.  



“Consoles are great… if you like paying extra for features PCs had in 2005.”
Around the Network
Chrkeller said:
angrypoolman said:

It puts you at 1 championship at best. Really it should be zero because PC is not part of the console race.

True.  The consoles are racing while PC is sitting back with its gold medal sipping some victory wine.  

PC just isnt part of the competition. They have no medals or championships or anything. The vast majority of PCs that are purchased are not for gaming. Theyre mainly purchased to do work on. Just another instance of how you people like to pad stats to add to the championship total, but its not going to work. All of nintendo's championships are legitimate, and ill say the same about sony and atari too. Microsoft, if they ever won a championship, would have a legitimate one as well. PC has no championships. Sorry, you can keep trying to distort reality to fit your narrative, but the rest of us can see it for what it is. 



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

angrypoolman said:
Chrkeller said:

True.  The consoles are racing while PC is sitting back with its gold medal sipping some victory wine.  

PC just isnt part of the competition. They have no medals or championships or anything. The vast majority of PCs that are purchased are not for gaming. Theyre mainly purchased to do work on. Just another instance of how you people like to pad stats to add to the championship total, but its not going to work. All of nintendo's championships are legitimate, and ill say the same about sony and atari too. Microsoft, if they ever won a championship, would have a legitimate one as well. PC has no championships. Sorry, you can keep trying to distort reality to fit your narrative, but the rest of us can see it for what it is. 

Agreed, because it sure ain't a competition.

More game sales, more active users, better game prices, largest library of games, free online, better graphics, mods, emulation, superior BC, etc.

You finally got something right, it isn't a competition.



“Consoles are great… if you like paying extra for features PCs had in 2005.”

I have seen more rational takes from people with schizophrenia in the middle of a psychosis than this championship bullshit. Old women with dementia making more sense than this championship take. I'm not even joking. I seriously have.



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

Leynos said:

I have seen more rational takes from people with schizophrenia in the middle of a psychosis than this championship bullshit. Old women with dementia making more sense than this championship take. I'm not even joking. I seriously have.

Ok then. Name something one of them has said thats more rational. And also tell me how you know they had schizophrenia? On what basis are you making that diagnosis 



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

Around the Network
Chrkeller said:
angrypoolman said:

PC just isnt part of the competition. They have no medals or championships or anything. The vast majority of PCs that are purchased are not for gaming. Theyre mainly purchased to do work on. Just another instance of how you people like to pad stats to add to the championship total, but its not going to work. All of nintendo's championships are legitimate, and ill say the same about sony and atari too. Microsoft, if they ever won a championship, would have a legitimate one as well. PC has no championships. Sorry, you can keep trying to distort reality to fit your narrative, but the rest of us can see it for what it is. 

Agreed, because it sure ain't a competition.

More game sales, more active users, better game prices, largest library of games, free online, better graphics, mods, emulation, superior BC, etc.

You finally got something right, it isn't a competition.

Cool stuff, but none of that wins you a championship. Im not trying to be obstinate, its just not how it works. Its like trying to say team X has better players, more home runs throughout the year, won more games overall, had the lowest team ERA, etc. Ok very cool, but did they win the championship? No? Oh, ok then.

Believe me, ive been there before many times where my team was clearly better but lost. It happens. You can try to cope with it all day long, but its not going to change the facts, its not going to change ultimately what is recorded that everybody wants. The best thing to do is to accept it. 



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

angrypoolman said:
Leynos said:

I have seen more rational takes from people with schizophrenia in the middle of a psychosis than this championship bullshit. Old women with dementia making more sense than this championship take. I'm not even joking. I seriously have.

Ok then. Name something one of them has said thats more rational. And also tell me how you know they had schizophrenia? On what basis are you making that diagnosis 

It's family. What they said is between me and them.



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

angrypoolman said:
Chrkeller said:

Agreed, because it sure ain't a competition.

More game sales, more active users, better game prices, largest library of games, free online, better graphics, mods, emulation, superior BC, etc.

You finally got something right, it isn't a competition.

Cool stuff, but none of that wins you a championship. Im not trying to be obstinate, its just not how it works. Its like trying to say team X has better players, more home runs throughout the year, won more games overall, had the lowest team ERA, etc. Ok very cool, but did they win the championship? No? Oh, ok then.

Believe me, ive been there before many times where my team was clearly better but lost. It happens. You can try to cope with it all day long, but its not going to change the facts, its not going to change ultimately what is recorded that everybody wants. The best thing to do is to accept it. 

Nah.  More like you think a pee wee league title means more than the super bowl.  

PC dominants gaming with an iron fist because of its clear and decisive superiority.  Your console is just an old dog laying under the kitchen table hoping for some scraps of food.

You exclude what you can't beat.  Sad.  



“Consoles are great… if you like paying extra for features PCs had in 2005.”
Chrkeller said:
angrypoolman said:

Cool stuff, but none of that wins you a championship. Im not trying to be obstinate, its just not how it works. Its like trying to say team X has better players, more home runs throughout the year, won more games overall, had the lowest team ERA, etc. Ok very cool, but did they win the championship? No? Oh, ok then.

Believe me, ive been there before many times where my team was clearly better but lost. It happens. You can try to cope with it all day long, but its not going to change the facts, its not going to change ultimately what is recorded that everybody wants. The best thing to do is to accept it. 

Nah.  More like you think a pee wee league title means more than the super bowl.  

PC dominants gaming with an iron fist because of its clear and decisive superiority.  Your console is just an old dog laying under the kitchen table hoping for some scraps of food.

You exclude what you can't beat.  Sad.  

Fine we are pee wee league. I dont care. Its the championships in that league that i care about. You can go have fun with all your superbowl trophies in the league where you are the only team 



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

angrypoolman said:
Chrkeller said:

Nah.  More like you think a pee wee league title means more than the super bowl.  

PC dominants gaming with an iron fist because of its clear and decisive superiority.  Your console is just an old dog laying under the kitchen table hoping for some scraps of food.

You exclude what you can't beat.  Sad.  

Fine we are pee wee league. I dont care. Its the championships in that league that i care about. You can go have fun with all your superbowl trophies in the league where you are the only team 

Agreed.  PC stands alone on mount high.  It doesn't mingle with the commoners.  

God status.  



“Consoles are great… if you like paying extra for features PCs had in 2005.”