By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
angrypoolman said:

PC just isnt part of the competition. They have no medals or championships or anything. The vast majority of PCs that are purchased are not for gaming. Theyre mainly purchased to do work on. Just another instance of how you people like to pad stats to add to the championship total, but its not going to work. All of nintendo's championships are legitimate, and ill say the same about sony and atari too. Microsoft, if they ever won a championship, would have a legitimate one as well. PC has no championships. Sorry, you can keep trying to distort reality to fit your narrative, but the rest of us can see it for what it is. 

Agreed, because it sure ain't a competition.

More game sales, more active users, better game prices, largest library of games, free online, better graphics, mods, emulation, superior BC, etc.

You finally got something right, it isn't a competition.

Cool stuff, but none of that wins you a championship. Im not trying to be obstinate, its just not how it works. Its like trying to say team X has better players, more home runs throughout the year, won more games overall, had the lowest team ERA, etc. Ok very cool, but did they win the championship? No? Oh, ok then.

Believe me, ive been there before many times where my team was clearly better but lost. It happens. You can try to cope with it all day long, but its not going to change the facts, its not going to change ultimately what is recorded that everybody wants. The best thing to do is to accept it. 



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0