My ideologies are 'what works' and 'justice', in that order. Currently it means I'm left-leaning in practice. The right seems to have a tendency to ignore nuances and complexities (not everyone, of course, but it seems too common), which the left seems to acknowledge much better. Of course the issue is that I'd have to be an expert in so many things to be reasonably sure I'm right in my assessment, and that's simply not a realistic option.
Is thing X going to be worth the cost? Makes sense that it would, but it's actually really hard to predict. The right often ignores the benefit of X altogether and simply says it's too expensive, whereas the left at least acknowledges the benefit, but I don't know if it's based on reasonable calculations. Regardless, at least acknowledging the benefits seems more trustworthy than simply ignoring them. Rinse and repeat for a lot of issues. Of course I don't assess the situation only based on who acknowledges and what, but with our economy not doing too great and there being talk of how we obviously can't afford certain things and not acknowledging the benefits of said things, the credibility of the right has certainly taken a hit in my eyes.
That said, I don't really consider myself to be left or right. It's the arguments that matter. I have some views that could be considered right-leaning or somewhat conservative too, but for the purposes of this thread, I'm definitely left-leaning.
What I really don't like is populist stuff. Everyone does populism, and I dislike it in both the left and the right, but for some, it's half of the whole thing. I wish we could do meritocracy instead of the current form of democracy so we could probably avoid much of the populism problem, but I also realize democracy might be our best option for getting rid of a bad administration that's bound to happen at some point. Sadly my faith in this aspect of democracy actually working as well as hoped has been shaken in the recent years.









