By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Assassin's Creed Shadows Review Thread 81 Opencritic / 82 Metacritic

 

I'm...

In day one 0 0%
 
Waiting for a sale 5 23.81%
 
Not buying at all 13 61.90%
 
No opinion or interest 3 14.29%
 
Total:21
pokoko said:

I've watched a bit of the reviews from Fextralife and Skill Up and it really just sounds like more of what you'd expect from Ubisoft and Assassin's Creed. At least, relative to the shinobi character. The samurai path sounds like a dud, since it drops all the things that people typically like about Assassin's Creed games.

Interesting decision from Ubisoft to have a main character route where you play the game from the standpoint of a warrior. They probably wanted to cash in on the Souls trend but trying to expand your audience often lowers the quality when you mash everything together. Reviews would probably have been more positive if they'd concentrated on the shinobi, both from a gameplay and a story perspective.

Honestly, the game sounds like a chore to get through, with the story seemingly trudging along in typical Ubisoft fashion where nothing interesting actually happens until it reaches the final chapter. They really need to look at how their open world games are structured and try something new.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking when it came to seeing the clips involving Yasuke fighting NPC's. I know Ubisoft is known for repeating/regurgitating their own concepts to death, but to see them just yoinking a style of play from another franchise to merge with it's own looks... weird (like you can tell they did this to try netting some Souls players into their demographic bubbles they most likely charted during the pitch/design phases). 



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Around the Network

I don't get it. It's just not getting a boost at all on Steam at this time in the evening. Does Ubisoft have a launcher or what perhaps with incentives?



LegitHyperbole said:

I don't get it. It's just not getting a boost at all on Steam at this time in the evening. Does Ubisoft have a launcher or what perhaps with incentives?

no, no launcher required this time for the game on Steam, but they do require you to login to their account system within the game itself. All they've done is take away the launcher requirement, but the account system rule remains in place, which isn't much of a change for a singleplayer game...



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
LegitHyperbole said:

I don't get it. It's just not getting a boost at all on Steam at this time in the evening. Does Ubisoft have a launcher or what perhaps with incentives?

no, no launcher required this time for the game on Steam, but they do require you to login to their account system within the game itself. All they've done is take away the launcher requirement, but the account system rule remains in place, which isn't much of a change for a singleplayer game...

It's odd the numbers aren't increasing so. Europeans should have bumped those numbers by now but they lost 2k people instead. 



40k players on pc... is that bad for a new AC, at launch?

Odyssey launched to 63k on pc (steam) as a example.
Lets see how high it goes tomorrow, since its a Friday.