By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - 2024 US Presidential Election

Honestly probably would have been better if trump had won back in 2020 instead. At least we would be rid of him by January instead of dealing with him till 2028



Around the Network
curl-6 said:
Ryuu96 said:

Curl in the 1930s-1940s: "So much for the tolerant left! The left only have themselves to blame for this, their authoritarian attitude for the past decade provided the perfect conditions for the Nazis to flourish!"

Spare me the lectures about Democrats rhetoric whilst you ignore everything that Trump and his supporters have said and done over the past few years and only ever bother to comment when it's to lecture Democrats, have I ever seen you comment on anything that Trump or his supporters have said or done? Because all I see is you coming in here to shout about Democrats not speaking kindly. Yes, Trump is a fascist and America just voted for a fascist and those who are aware of this fact, knowingly voted for a fascist, so what do that say about them?

Some of them clearly do love his fascist agenda, some of them just don't care about voting a fascist in power if it benefits them (likely the majority), but I will say that some of them may not have known everything he has said and done or what others who worked closest to him have said about him, especially since some people didn't even know Joe Biden wasn't running anymore. Some of you seem so surprised to find out that humans can be incredibly selfish, easily influenced and yes, even fascist, Lol.

Authoritarian Leftists...Smdh....Lol.

She lost largely because of inflation, not because people were called a fascist, JFC. Lmao. That's a peak online take.

In this very thread I have called Trump "awful" and a "dumpster fire":

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/248303/2024-us-presidential-election/145/#2

The truth is, a big part of Trump's appeal is that he makes many people who feel disenfranchised feel seen and heard. It doesn't matter that if he's actually going to solve their problems; he makes them feel that he will.

If the left are ever going to defeat Trumpism, they can't afford to keep just dismissing anyone who supports him as just irredeemable evil Nazis who can't be reasoned with. Doing so doesn't confront the root problem, it just sweeps it under the rug where it continues to fester and grow.

We've seen this play out twice now; his base is written off as just a "basketful of deplorables" only to then beat expectations come election day.

I'm not a Trump supporter, I'm not even a conservative, but clearly the left's approach to Trumpism is a losing strategy.

Am I to understand that Kamala lost because Hillary Clinton was mean to Trump supporters? Or do we have something possibly more relevant to this particular campaign?



...

LurkerJ said:
curl-6 said:

"Anyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi."
"OMG why is the country suddenly so full of Nazis."

The left has only themselves to blame for this, their authoritarian attitude for the past decade provided the perfect conditions for the alt right to flourish.

I mean if you blamed the Clinton’s and Obama’s neoliberalism I’d sympathise and agree. But this is really lazy and so 2016, even for you.

Kamala’s campaign was devoid of any cultural bs rhetoric. The American right dominate twitter, YouTube and the most popular podcasts. Authoritarianism? What the fuck are you talking about

That's the thing though, the Dems are tied to "the left" in people's minds whether they like it or not. It didn't matter that Harris steered clear of that sort of thing in the last few months leading up to the day, the baggage of the last ten years was there in people's minds regardless, and conservative messaging made sure to connect the two.

It's not fair, but it's how things are.

There's honestly not much Harris could do, she was tied to an unpopular regime and a platform that had lost touched with a lot of the population.

The silver lining is, the pendulum swings both ways, and it's unlikely Trump will manage to fix much of what he claims he will, so if Dems play their cards right, they could win back power in 2028.

But to do so they're going to have to go back to the drawing board and rethink their strategy, because the current one isn't working.



Torillian said:
curl-6 said:

In this very thread I have called Trump "awful" and a "dumpster fire":

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/248303/2024-us-presidential-election/145/#2

The truth is, a big part of Trump's appeal is that he makes many people who feel disenfranchised feel seen and heard. It doesn't matter that if he's actually going to solve their problems; he makes them feel that he will.

If the left are ever going to defeat Trumpism, they can't afford to keep just dismissing anyone who supports him as just irredeemable evil Nazis who can't be reasoned with. Doing so doesn't confront the root problem, it just sweeps it under the rug where it continues to fester and grow.

We've seen this play out twice now; his base is written off as just a "basketful of deplorables" only to then beat expectations come election day.

I'm not a Trump supporter, I'm not even a conservative, but clearly the left's approach to Trumpism is a losing strategy.

Am I to understand that Kamala lost because Hillary Clinton was mean to Trump supporters? Or do we have something possibly more relevant to this particular campaign?

Not because of that particular comment, of course.

More that both times Trump's base was underestimated as a few malcontents who could be scolded, shamed and dismissed, only to then turn out to be far bigger and more powerful than expected. 



curl-6 said:
Torillian said:

Am I to understand that Kamala lost because Hillary Clinton was mean to Trump supporters? Or do we have something possibly more relevant to this particular campaign?

Not because of that particular comment, of course.

More that both times Trump's base was underestimated as a few malcontents who could be scolded, shamed and dismissed, only to then turn out to be far bigger and more powerful than expected. 

I feel like you're blaming this on internet shit. Sure I do all those things you said but I'm not a politician or of any power in the party. I'm just doing what the Right has done to my side for decades and I don't see what that has to do with the presidential race. Just seems more like this shit from Legite where you say "oh Kamala is such a liar" right before "well I mean Trump says lies but he's dumb so he's not a liar". The left has to handhold all the right voters while they get called groomers and commies. 



...

Around the Network
Torillian said:
curl-6 said:

Not because of that particular comment, of course.

More that both times Trump's base was underestimated as a few malcontents who could be scolded, shamed and dismissed, only to then turn out to be far bigger and more powerful than expected. 

I feel like you're blaming this on internet shit. Sure I do all those things you said but I'm not a politician or of any power in the party. I'm just doing what the Right has done to my side for decades and I don't see what that has to do with the presidential race. Just seems more like this shit from Legite where you say "oh Kamala is such a liar" right before "well I mean Trump says lies but he's dumb so he's not a liar". The left has to handhold all the right voters while they get called groomers and commies. 

That's the thing, I feel like in today's social media driven world we spend so much time online that "internet shit" can't be separated from the rest of lives as easily as it could be say 15 or even 10 years ago. People, especially the younger generation, are almost constantly plugged into social media.



Nancy, here's a tissue.



I feel I should clarify; I'm not trying to just stir the pot here, so I do apologize if my posts came off that way. In retrospect, I should have been more measured.

I was simply speaking from a place of frustration. I'm not a fan of Trumpism, but we really shouldn't be finding ourselves in a situation where someone like Trump can be considered a preferable option in the first place.



pikashoe said:

Honestly probably would have been better if trump had won back in 2020 instead. At least we would be rid of him by January instead of dealing with him till 2028

I agree.

A new level of lunacy started after that loss and so much BS became normalised. Trump would’ve been “responsible” for inflation too.

Yes yes, I am still coping



curl-6 said:

I feel I should clarify; I'm not trying to just stir the pot here, so I do apologize if my posts came off that way. In retrospect, I should have been more measured.

I was simply speaking from a place of frustration. I'm not a fan of Trumpism, but we really shouldn't be finding ourselves in a situation where someone like Trump can be considered a preferable option in the first place.

I'll extend an olive branch: I totally get it, something's gone wrong. But I can't help but be frustrated when people on the right in this very thread make shitty posts like the one a couple above. That's totally dismissive and derisive but for some reason it's only the left who has to watch their rhetoric. The right has figured out how to make the shitty rhetoric a feature rather than a bug and it is wholly frustrating. People of positions of power on the right made jokes about the attack on Paul Pelosi while the democratic party in its entirety gets blamed if someone random on facebook does the same for Trump's assassination attempts. 

Here's a simple example. see if any republican on TV ever calls it the democratic party, no instead they call it the democrat party as a little insult every time. Or mispronounces people's names or says "Barack Houssein Obama". Is there anything like that from the left that is from positions of power rather than just random left internet users?



...