Renamed said:
Biden was selected as VP by Obama because he was a quiet antipode to Obama's flair (As did Trump later did with Pence). But that same quiet was a liability against the overly boisterous Trump. To be honest, we got lucky in 2020. Biden chose Harris as his VP in part to counterpart his own lacking levels of panache. And Biden has only dropped further down the excitement scale since. Harris is giving just the right amount of adrenaline to wake up the party. While she's not on Obama's level of elan, she doesn't have to be either. She just has to be enough.
And for VPs specifically, neither party is all that great at selecting them either but the Republican party really has a tough time with it the past several cycles. I thought nobody would make as bad of a political faux pas as McCain in tapping Palin but here we are with Trump giving the VP seat to Vance.
|
Don't forget about Paul Ryan. Conservatives cheered thunderously when he was announced as Romney's running mate. The Tea Party actually wanted him more than they did Romney. Romney was dismissed by tax activist Grover Norquist as a "hand with ten working digits to hold a pen to sign the Ryan budget." In addition to this, Ryan is Catholic, and was likely chosen in part to make it more palatable for evangelicals and Middle American working class to vote for a Mormon president.
Then he started stuff like washing a few pre-washed dishes at a rescue mission, and he became the butt of many a Democratic joke. He became the Speaker of the House after the Romney/Ryan ticket lost in 2012, but ended up making his predecessor, John Boehner, look halfway competent by comparison, and his political career fizzled out. He went from being in a string of bad Republican VP choices to being the latest (at the time) in a string of bad Republican Speakers.
I still strongly feel that Mark Kelly needs to stay in the Senate, where we really need all hands on deck. Shapiro has my vote as a VP.
Last edited by SanAndreasX - on 30 July 2024