I've had a ps5 since launch.  I own and play more switch than ps5, because it has better games.  

Which Nier? Automata? rofl ok. Nier original? No shit. Nier Replicant? rofl ok.

That's nice and thanks for sharing your opinion when no asked, but we were talking about games like witcher 3 and doom 2016 would you wanna play those on Switch and get a butchered experience or ps5.

If you think nier Automata is ps4 show case graphically then maybe you should visit the eye doctor. It's never mentioned when people talk about impressive ps4 graphics.

Yeah, I have Doom on PS5 thanks. It looks better on PC than PS5. See how that goes. No one asked for yours either but the funny thing about forums. They're public and given anyway. No one is asked for. You use the old fallacy realism is the only indicator of advanced rendering and lighting techniques. Plus it's not all visuals. BOTW and TOTK physics systems attest to that. When ToTK is doing things some devs thought not even PS5 was capable of with Ultra hand. You use false equivalence.

I'd rather play Tears, given it is better than any game you've mentioned.  

Also who cares about games that are 5 years old?  The switch has new and exclusive games.  I'm not worried about old news.

We are talking about graphics/performance. What games you prefer has nothing to with conversation. As for that dev that said he's freelancer artist. No dev thought it was impossible lol.

The op seems to talk a lot  about graphics but tech ans just doesn't make sense to that someone like that has super dated hardware unless he's doing bad finically then I apologize 

You can't compare AMD with nVidia and assume they are "equivalent" comparisons.

1) nVidia tends to have higher geometry throughput.
2) nVidia tends to have better Ray Tracing performance.
3) nVidia tends to have different bottlenecks in it's rendering pipeline.
4) 2070 Super and 3050 are chalk and cheese. At higher resolutions (Or usage of heavy Alpha effects) the 2070 would be in another league due to TWICE the amount of memory bandwidth.
The 3050 is slower than the 2060 Super, let alone the 2070 Super. - https://www.techspot.com/review/2403-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3050/

And if you took note of my comments, you will see that I said it falls between the 6700 and 6700XT, it's not a pure 6700XT equivalent.

Fact is, in terms of clockrates/architecture/functional units, the Playstation 5 closely resembles the 6700/6700XT parts in terms of capability.

It comes down to how much time you are willing to invest in "baking" your assets. - Every generation effects are becoming more dynamic and more resource intensive.
But the Switch doesn't have that luxury.

However when a competent developer keeps the Alpha transparency memory-bandwidth sapping effects to a minimum, bakes the lighting and shadows, the Switch can look impressive considering it's hardware, more so than launch PS4 or Xbox One games.

A game like Zelda: Links Awakening remake with it's very impressive material shaders and buffer effects, I would argue looks better than Xbox One launch titles like Dead Rising 3.

I played and finished tears and yea its a 8. elden ring is on another level but we are talking about ps4 ports that run sub HD and unstable 30fps he's gonna have a much better time.

I fully understand and I think we are saying the same thing.  My point was the 2070 super isn't a weak gpu.  It is quite strong, even today.  Some seem to take an issue saying the 2070 super and the ps5 are comparable....  they are comparable.

 Fair enough it isn't the best comparison but they are in the same league.  That was my point.

And RT is terrible on the ps5.  

Edit

And I get the impression some are making the mistake of assuming a 3000 card is better than a 2000 card...  which isn't the case.