killer7 said:
Kyuu said:
Explain why 2028 would be suicide and how the next Xbox launching in 2026 poses a threat. This brings back memories.
|
Quite easy. MS would get a headstart of 2 years (Xbox 360 anyone?) Nintendo will have 3 years. Remember what happened with PS3? This is a risc Sony will not want! Also if Switch really runs as good as many people predicting it could be a record breaking launch! Add in the fact that the MS/ Activision contract includes all Activision games for Nintendo systems for 10 years but only COD for Playstation, does bring some riscs. Nintendo is basically guaranteed to get all Activision games for 10 years. It could be that Sony gets more but the contract only saves COD for them. If the Switch 2 becomes THE mobile device for 3rd parties AND the Nintendo games (MK, Smash, Zelda, Pokémon, Metroid, Kirby...)+ former Xboy exclusives like Halo, Forza, Gears... AND has physical games (PS6 will likley be digital only) that won't be nothing and it must be taken into account by Sony. Just saying "Nintendo is no competition" like some vgchartz users shout is no solution! The industry sees them in competition. Also consider the fact that Sony ports their games to PC and Nintendo does not. Xbox is a lot smaller than it used to be but its far from a nobody! Sony cannot just do what they like and get an easy win! We saw this in gen 7, we somehow see it in Gen 9 (vs Switch) and YES i am comparing Switch directly with PS5 and Xbox! See what i mean?
@Kyuu
A full next gen system (PS or Xbox) will be a good chunk more powerfull than last gen. If Sony/ MS decides to make a next gen only experience, this gens graphics will be a childs birthday. You cannot rely on that everything gets cross gen releases.
|
PS5pro is basically that.... its a recently launched hardware... and it shows how much more powerfull and the price of such a unit, its currently able to be.
Is that what you want?
A Series X2 (new gen xbox) , thats basically just xbox version of a PS5pro ?
Comeing in around 700$?
Do you want it much more powerfull? are you willing to take on a 1000$ price point or something?
Just imagine it.
Here is this 1,000$ xbox, that only plays 3rd party and xbox games.... and mostly its extra power is used for raytracing.
Here is a 400$ PS5 digital, that runs slightly lower resolution, no raytracing but games look almost the same. It plays Playstation games, xbox games, and 3rd party.
Which do you think will do better in the market?
Be honest.
Its a stupid idea... you need the new tech to be ready first.
I think you wait, until you can do this:
You would want atleast a AMD cpu with 3D vcache, and atleast RDNA 4 (9000 series amd cards tech) inside.
You would want to secure GDDR7 for it.... and maybe aim higher than 16gb total, so like maybe 24gb (with a 384bit bus)?
(cost saveing wise, maybe its smarter to do another gen, with 16gb and 256bit bus... they *need* to add like 4gb of ram for OS ect then though imo)
You would want to make use of FSR4..... so it becomes a default, requirement for any game on the console.
(just like nintendo hopefully make DLSS mandatory for all Switch2 games)
And get it under 700$.
If your team of engineers, think its not feasiable to do so.... its just a no go, to do a new console.
If you kickstart thing early, blow your load on the wrong things.... you just set yourself behinde, when the other party launches with the right parts.
Last edited by JRPGfan - on 16 February 2025