By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

BREAKING via Reuters

Trump has filed a lawsuit against Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and two Wall Street Journal reporters for the story about the letter he allegedly signed for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday.

Complaint, which is not available yet, was filed in Miami federal court.

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yasharali.bsky.social) 18 July 2025 at 22:11

Will he try to get it in front of Cannon so she can delay it for years?

This will be amazing if it makes it to court but I expect it won't and Trump will try to settle it outside of court, a little money exchange where WSJ doesn't actually have to say they were wrong but Trump can publicly claim he "won" and use that as "proof" that they made the whole thing up, there's zero chance Trump will want this to actually go to court and have discovery done on him.

Breaking: President Trump IS filing a libel lawsuit against the WSJ, according to the docket filed in federal court in South Florida. Trump is suing for libel, assault and slander, the docket indicates. A copy of the lawsuit was not attached to the docket.

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter.bsky.social) 18 July 2025 at 22:10



Around the Network

A mysterious court docket appears to show that President Donald Trump filed a libel lawsuit Friday against News Corp. and its chairman emeritus, Rupert Murdoch.

But there are signs that something is weird.

The docket, which appears in federal court in the Southern District of Florida, did not include an actual lawsuit an hour after it first appeared.

But a person close to Trump's legal team told Business Insider that the president has not yet filed his lawsuit over The Wall Street Journal report, and that his legal complaint is still in the works.

The Miami court docket features odd details. It says that Trump is a "pro se" plaintiff — meaning someone who is not being represented by a lawyer — even though Trump has many personal lawyers, and he has filed many lawsuits against media organizations in the same district.

The docket also appears to show the personal addresses for Murdoch and for one of the journalists who wrote the story, who are designated as defendants.

The clerk's office in the Southern District of Florida federal court did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Representatives for News Corp., Dow Jones, and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.

Trump Lawsuit Docket Over Wall Street Journal Report Has Odd Details - Business Insider



Pemalite said:

The most intelligent people on Earth are a group of Physicists standing in the same room... And they come from all backgrounds... Otherwise we are all the same, with a few key feature variants.

So with that, can we get away from the stereotyping of demographics and move on? It's not constructive.

Ok, well, that's a much better way to explain things than the passive aggressive responses that some people (as well as some mods) have shown.  I've tried to let this go several times and they keep wanting to talk, so i'm up for it.  There's no need to try and nitpick and find fallacies in one's argument when that's all the discussion that they have to give.  At least svennoJ had heartfelt things to say even though i disagree with a lot of what he says.  Finally, you get more flies with honey as they say, so thanks for trying to reach us and me in a better way.

Last edited by shavenferret - on 18 July 2025



xboxgreen said:

Depends on what you define as rich and what life style they choose to live. Someone who has 3 million dollars in net worth is consider rich to me. If they want to travel a lot and see the world they can. However, they will have to be careful not to overspend or else they will lose all of of their money. A rich billionaire life style might be an entrepreneur who wants to use their money to create new products, services and innovation. That requires a lot of money sometimes.

If you start taxing rich people a lot more they will find ways to recoup their loses. Usually at the cost of the middle class. People end up poor a lot because of their own doing majority of the time. They don't invest and pay off their debt. Then when something comes up like a layoff, they don't have any money and blame everyone else. Even though if they invest their money they would've been fine.

Teachers are a good example on how to become rich. Teachers may not get paid the most but are one of the demographics that become millionaires more frequent than any other profession. Because it is all about time and budgeting.

Not to mention if you tax too much you end up losing more tax revenue. For example, if you tax rich people a much higher rate then the billionaires will leave and stop investing in the United Staes. If you tax middle/poor class too much they will stop working because there will be no point in working.

I feel like I'm going to really need to see some support for the claim that rich people will recoup their losses of taxes at the cost of the middle class. Like, okay, say you're a rich ass doctor working for a big city hospital, and suddenly you start getting taxed a few thousand more per year. What are you going to do, start stealing kidneys from poor people?

I understand the argument when it comes to business taxes. It is flawed in my opinion, as it largely ignores market factors (ie supply/demand and competition), but there is some logic there. Some amount of cost is going to be passed on in many circumstances. I would argue that taxing huge multinational companies helps smaller companies maintain a competitive position and overall, if the tax money is being spent in a productive manner, it can still function as a means to maintain a more equal income structure. 

But when it comes to individual taxes, things don't work that way:

More broadly, beyond the 2017 law, a 2023 review of the trickle-down literature by Carnegie Mellon University economist Max Risch found that “across different income tax policies that statutorily affect the rich, the evidence suggests the burden is predominantly born by the rich.” In other words, research indicates that tax cuts at the top don’t generally benefit workers with low and moderate incomes. By contrast, Risch concludes that “substantial evidence suggests large direct, but also potential ‘trickle-up’ effects from providing benefits to low-income or vulnerable households.”

The 2017 Trump Tax Law Was Skewed to the Rich, Expensive, and Failed to Deliver on Its Promises | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities



Around the Network






All that religious hysteria has a silver lining

Huckabee visits Palestinian Christian town after settler attack

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has visited Taybeh, a Palestinian Christian town near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, following a recent attack by Israeli settlers that damaged an ancient church site.

“What has happened here is an absolute travesty, and it’s my desire to do everything possible to let the people of this peaceful village know that we will certainly insist that those who carry out acts of terror and violence in Taybeh – or anywhere – be found and be prosecuted,” Huckabee said in a statement that does not contain the word “settler” or “Israel”.

“Not just reprimanded, that’s not enough. People need to pay a price for doing something that destroys that which belongs, not just to other people, but that which belongs to God.”

Huckabee – an evangelical Christian who has previously said there is no such thing as the West Bank – is one of the most pro-Israel members of the Trump administration.

But he mirrored growing criticism of the Israeli government this week, particularly after Israeli settlers killed a 20-year-old American citizen in the West Bank. “There must be accountability for this criminal and terrorist act,” Huckabee wrote on social media about the killing of Sayfollah Musallet.

Separately, Israeli media outlets reported that Huckabee wrote a letter to the Israeli Interior Ministry threatening to impose visa curbs on Israelis seeking to visit the US in response to alleged restrictions on American evangelical Christian groups trying to come to Israel.



Huckabee has a red line.



This is what happens when you give terrorists support and impunity, they'll eventually turn on you as well.

https://hmd.org.uk/resource/first-they-came-by-pastor-martin-niemoller/



Defunding weather services is a very dumb thing to do. Natural disasters happen all the time and it only takes 1 really bad weather event to cause a huge amount of damage. The Texas flood literally proves how important weather services are and a clear example of why cutting funding is a bad idea.

Of course, defunding many of the things the current administration is doing is a very dumb and messed up thing to do.