Means very little without more information. 

Not really. 
The age group is statistically more progressive because of young women. Young men on the other hand are as conservative as ever.

Young Women become more liberal, men are stable

Young men more conservative than boomers

You're wrong about the demographics.

The donation might very well be meaningless. People can change politics over a few years. Donald Trump was supposedly a Democrat for a long time. And he switched when he was an older person, which is a lot less common than it is for a 17 year old.  

People also overwhelmingly register to vote in the party they support. Yet that doesn't seem to matter to you.

Shooting at a president can have non political motivations. Hinckley was reportedly seeking fame to impress actress Jodie Foster, with whom he had a fixation after watching her in Martin Scorsese's 1976 film Taxi Driver. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and remained under institutional psychiatric care for over three decades

This guy for instance had a bunch of different ideas, attacking two different political people on opposite sides of the aisle, also had the idea of hijacking a plane; because he wanted attention. 

I feel like arguing the difference between a mass shooting and an assassination attempt that hit a few other people, is splitting hairs over the dumbest things. 

Your narrative is based on picking and choosing how to interpret the 3 facts that we have about this person. 

I left it out because Sundin addressed it but nice try

I see you addressed nothing in response LOL.

Christ, okay. Lmao. Okay, I'll be more clear for you, I'll needlessly expand instead of simply saying a few words which basically sum up my point anyway but I need to be SUUUUUUPER specific for you, apparently, and only you.

I do not believe this dude decided to assassinate Donald J Trump because he's an angry Democrat who believes he can stop Donald J Trump. I believe the most likely scenario right now is he is yet another American shooter who decided to go out in a blaze of glory and make a name for himself, send a fuck you to the world after feeling like the world has let him down, another American slipped through the cracks of an awful mental health crisis, therefore I do not believe there is a political motivation even if Donald J Trump was a former President. That just makes the target more "juicy" for the shooter. It would make him go down in history. He wanted the attention and he got it. I apologise for saying it is a mass shooting because 3 people didn't die. He simply carelessly shot into a crowded area, attempted to kill one person, killed another person and critically injured 2 more, I don't know what you want me to call that, "multiple-people almost killed, one-dead shooting?" A bit of a mouthful but there you go.

I mean, I've definitely donated money to things I didn't have a monumental attachment to. It's $15. It's not that serious. 

As for Ryuu's thoughts, they are mostly just his opinions. John Hinckley Jr tried to assassinate Reagan not for overtly political reasons, but because he wanted to impress Jodie Foster. We don't have enough information one way or the other to determine a motive in this case. It could have been a fame and opportunity thing (aka, motives similar to many mass shooters) and not a political thing. I don't know. Again, neither do you.

EDIT: Lol, pi guy beat me to the Hinckley anecdote...

Nah, Trump ain't a Republican, he donated to Democrats once, people can't change their stance.

Seriously though yeah, young men are becoming more right-wing, it's women who are more left-wing.

I partly blame people like Andrew Tate though he is taking them to an extreme and creating a whole generation of angry incels.

I mean yeah, I've said multiple times my opinion is just a theory but it's the one I believe is more plausible with the facts we have right now.

We still don't have enough information to say with upmost certainty what his motivation was.

Neither theory is a fact right now.

It is a fact he was a registered Republican though.

It is not a fact he was a Democrat posing as a Republican to vote against them.

This was mentioned in a link before but I was curious about your feelings here so I took a screenshot of the graph. Seems like this dude's age group is most likely to be moderate or conservative. Does this change your analysis?

Thank you for pointing out that Ryuu's posts are just opinions and not based on facts.

Brother, I labelled it right from the start as a "theory" and a "likely scenario" and "plausible" and even in the very first reply say I could be wrong because I was never saying my whole theory was a fact, I was saying based on the facts, I find my theory/scenario to be more plausible/likely, that isn't me saying "BASED ON THE FACTS I'M 100% CORRECT AND THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED"

===

"instead find the "typical mass shooter" scenario to be the most plausible with the facts we have right now."

"Maybe I'm wrong but with the evidence we have right now, I'd argue that your scenario is far more implausible."

US Politics |OT|

"Everything else is theory and I find my theory holds more water than yours with the facts that we have."

US Politics |OT|

Opinions can be based on facts. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive.

In my opinion, you are the one who keeps taking things too far with your assertions, not Ryuu...